Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

Painful.

The van is MoT'd and taxed until next year. It isn't considered a danger to others. The parking bay it is parked in the parking restriction sign has been removed. So it can;t be ticketed.

A new parking restrictions sign/plate will shortly be installed and it will start collecting tickets.

Despite the van being covered in graffiti little the council can do apart from give it tickets and eventually remove. Clearly someone has removed the parking restrictions sign delaying this taking place. Fortunately the soon expected parking tickets will quickly more than cover the cost to council tax payers. Phew!

Have I got this right?


1] A van is parked legally.


2] A handful of residents and a local politician don't like this.


3] The local politician arranges for a sign to be put up to make the van now parked illegally.


4] No provision has been made to inform the van owner of the change of status.


5] Local politician is gleeful about penalties the van owner will now receive.


John K


lrhaf

hi edhistory,

1. No. While the plate with parking restrictions isn't present they're parking LEGALLY.

2. Correct. it is covered in grasffiti and appears abandoned. We know from the broken windows theory that this will be increasing the risk of anti social and cirminal behaviour.

3. No. local politican arranges for the missing sign - that someone has illegally removed - to be replaced.

4. No. I'm hoping the owner will move their van so it will be parking legally which is I why I've advertised the fact. Officers have said that although it may not be road worthy it isn't a danger to others.


We have a local problem of graffiti on vans. It has nearly put two small local businesses that Im directly aware of out of business.


Boy, John, have you got out of bed the wrong sidfe today ;o)

edhistory


1) A van is parked legally


James Barber


1) No. While the plate with parking restrictions isn't present they're parking LEGALLY


Therefore, someone makes a statement or viewpoint. Local politician (any politician) replies by contradicting that viewpoint but actually agrees with it but "shouts" to get his point across because, as we all know, politicians always know best and never listen properly because they're so wrapped up with themselves.


** sits back and awaits reply from local politician stating my overview is wrong **

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
    • Yup Juan is amazing (and his partner can't remember her name!). Highly recommend the wine tastings.  Won't be going to the new chain.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...