Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My partner and I live in East Dulwich and have been trying to buy a house here for some time. We've found one we like within our price range, however as with most properties that fall within our budget it is outside of East Dulwich. I was wondering if anybody knows the area round Dylways off Denmark Hill, also near sunray, and if you could tell me if it's rough? It's near an estate but during the day it looked alright... no grafitti etc. The house is ideal and it's near all those lovely old houses just off denmark hill, but the estate is a worry. Any help (don't spare me, I can take bad news) would be much appreciated.


love and thanks!

Hi Clarabelle - I actually grew up from the age of 3 in Dylways and my Mum and Dad are still there and also four doors along is also my sister and her family.


I think although it's "an estate" it's not rough at all, compared to some places. I would still feel safe walking around there at night, although probably because I grew up there and lived there until the age of 29 - and know the area. But you are near all the local schools, bus routes, parks, train stations etc.


The estate is kept clean as far as I know - my mother and father-in-law live in the flats near the parade of shops in Crossthwaithe Avenue. They have had trouble with youths on motor bikes in that part of the estate but I think that has died down now.


I still walk around the estate and know a lot of people living there.

One of the ex-council houses... yeah I think that's a good buy, some of them are quite nice. It's fine round there, not rough at all.


I lived on the actual estate (Basington Way) for 6 months, and it was fine there too. Very quiet... of course you got a few teenagers around but I never saw any trouble. Very little sign of vandalism or graffiti, and I used to come and go at all times of night and never felt threatened. The only hassle I ever got was from the bloody traffic wardens.

That is extremely helpful everyone! Thanks so much, feel much better about it now. :)-D will show this thread to the OH! northlondoner, I will have a look at some of the Forest Hill properties you mentioned. Minder, your post has really put my mind at ease! We'll go and have another goosey and maybe put an offer in! Keep your fingers and toes crossed for us!


CB

Hi, I lived in Crossthwaite Avenue for 4 years and wouldn't say it was rough at all - I always felt comfortable coming home in the dark late at night. You do get a few kids from the estate misbehaving occassionally (they used to climb onto my hedge and sometimes into my garden - did a bit of damage to the hedge but no malicious harm, letting off fireworks in teh street around bonfire night, that kind of thing) but other than that it's fine and a very handy location in that you're so close to dulwich, denmark hill and camberwell.

Good luck with the house hunting!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...