Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree it's revolting but I am deeply depressed by the sheer number of petitions these days. I've signed many in the past but every day I get emails about petitions on pretty much every subject under the sun. So many that they now seem worthless.


Letter writing campaigns would probably be a better way to go?

It is disgusting but cannot deny that back in the 70/80's I never participated myself.


The Last bus from Lewisham to Peckham there were lots of people eating and I believe smoking

was still allowed (Tube 9th July 1984 smoking banned) not sure about the buses.


DulwichFox

Nigello - I never suggested chucking litter on the floor was even remotely acceptable! But as others have said, if you have two appointments/engagements with little time in between then eating a sandwich on a train is a good solution. Some people are busier than others.


Anyone who gets all flustered about other passengers eating cold food on the train has issues IMO.

I disagree.


Banning all food and drink - except water or baby milk - would really reduce litter for a start. Cold food can be smelly and offensive as well as hot food.

Public transport is a shared, public space; the best way to act in such a space is to adopt neutral behaviour, so no smoking, drinking of alcohol, playing music out loud etc. Such behaviour is civil, respectful and desirable. (I practise what I preach.)

No excuse for eating in a confined space, full stop. It's about time signs warning people of harsh on the spot penalty notices were put in place on public transport. Maybe the cameras used could aid community support staff or PCSO's doing random purges on buses or trains. Not only is it antisocial it's risky for people with allergies (things containing peanuts etc). The smell of disgusting fast food being shoved in someone's face is out of line and if I used public transport I would happily pop people out for doing so.


Louisa.

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shall we start the "doing your make-up on public

> transport, acceptable/unacceptable" debate again?

> That one was fun.



I can't even remember that one, sounds great.


So what is the most anti social / just plain minging thing you've encountered on public transport?


Mine is a bloke shaving and letting the cuttings just fall to the floor.

I think there must be a middle ground here somewhere. No compromise with buses, but certainly with trains I can appreciate having a dedicated buffet carriage where you can happily eat and drink without annoying others. Flying is a seperate issue because it's often long and everyone will be hungry at some stage.


Louisa.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But trains have buffet cars and sell Tea Coffee

> and hot and cold snacks to eat on board..

>

> Food is served on Aircraft Hot and cold meals..

> Should we ban those..??

>

> Cannot see a total ban ever being implemented.

>

> DulwichFox


It is already banned in most countries, so not sure why it would be impossible in UK? it self polices itself in the same way people no longer tolerate smoking in public indoors

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibited_activities_on_public_transport

I once sat on a tube seat without realising that someone has wet themselves on it. I can still smell it, years later.


Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edcam Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Shall we start the "doing your make-up on

> public

> > transport, acceptable/unacceptable" debate

> again?

> > That one was fun.

>

>

> I can't even remember that one, sounds great.

>

> So what is the most anti social / just plain

> minging thing you've encountered on public

> transport?

>

> Mine is a bloke shaving and letting the cuttings

> just fall to the floor.

Trains from London to Glasgow min. journey time 5 hours.


Bristol to Glasgow min. 7 hours.


I do not think it is reasonable to expect people to go without food for that length of time.


Anybody, not just children, the elderly, diabetics. Everyone need to eat and drink.


DulwichFox

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I disagree.

>

> Banning all food and drink - except water or baby

> milk - would really reduce litter for a start.


So basically because some people can't be bothered to take their rubbish home, everyone should be banned from doing anything that might involve the creation of some rubbish? Bit of an overreaction, and as others said, the biggest form of litter on public transport is papers not food related rubbish.


As for some cold food being smelly, trust me, I've yet to encounter any cold food that smells worse than a sweaty labourer - but what are you going to do - ban people with heavy manual jobs from using public transport too?


Never got why people get upset about women doing their make up on public transport either - am more intrigued as to how they manage to do it without poking their eye out with a mascara wand, which is what I would do for sure.


I will confess I find people who insist on playing music out loud or so loud you can hear it through their earphones annoying, but if I put my ipod on and stick my nose in a book I can usually tune it out and not let it bother me.


If I couldn't hack travelling with lots of other people, I wouldn't live in London...

Britain is still the only European country in which people routinely eat like this on crowded public transport. Try it in France ? even a breakfast croissant ? and you will be regarded with open derision and hostility and considered badly brought up. But then in France they take eating much more seriously and people commonly believe doing it while on the move to be detrimental to health. Only animals eat standing up, they say ? and they?re astonished by what they see on the Tube here.


On the bus in Peckham, the done thing is to spit the bones of your fried chicken onto the floor

Greengod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But then in France they take eating much more seriously and people commonly

> believe doing it while on the move to be detrimental to health.


Surely such an absurd belief nullifies any argument based on what the French do.

Eating on Trains in Japan..


ekiben-shot.jpg?w=580&h=425


Many bullet trains even have a trolley or food-cart service not unlike those on long-haul flights, offering travellers a choice of drinks and snacks as well as alcoholic beverages and souvenirs. As well as this, many larger bullet train stations sell special ekiben packed lunches distinct to that geographical area that customers are able to enjoy during their train ride using the built-in tray tables, making it perfectly acceptable to consume food on-board a bullet train.


Even so, it is considered polite to utter a quick ?shitsureishimasu? (lit. ?I?m being rude?) to the person sitting next to you before tucking in?


Foxy

Greengod Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Britain is still the only European country in

> which people routinely eat like this on crowded

> public transport.


Bullshit. Lived in Paris, people ate on public transport. Over the past year, have travelled to Sweden a lot - the Copenhagen to Malmo train, people eating on public transport. Spain and Italy, people eating on buses (I haven't taken the train much there).


One person's made up assertion does not a fact make.


And for the love of god, this thread - what kind of uptight nimby, judgmental area am I living in?

I think people are missing the point. Some people are considerate and discreet, some are not. When you are sharing a confined space it should be preferable to at least acknowledge those around you before cracking up a bag of hot chicken wings you've bought from Sainbury's. In summer especially I can only imagine the smell that would be lingering around a packed bus. Clearly common courtesy isn't the order of the day anymore, so enforcement by fines is the only way ahead.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...