Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just wondered if anyone else is struggling with the outcome of the election and the prospect of another 5 years of this regime? I had such hope for change and now I fear that if change ever does come it will be too late. The welfare state and public services will have been well and truly dismantled in 5 years time and we will need a truly radical opposition to rebuild them. Anyone else feeling similarly downhearted?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/59824-post-election-blues/
Share on other sites

Nope. All the scare-story hoo-har over Tories "dismantling" the welfare state, public services, NHS, etc, etc, won't come to pass. Yes, they'll be cut back, but Labour would have done that too. And I guarantee you that in five years time there will still be an NHS and a welfare state.


A much, much worse situation would have been had we been saddled with an unstable minority government and back at the polls before the year was out.


I'd be more worried if I were you to make sure that the upcoming referendum keeps us in the EU. Pulling out of the EU would be an absolutely economic disaster that will have a massive knock-on effect on the services you mention.

I'm rather in favour of the referendum, with luck (and unlike the Scottish one) it will put the issue on the back-burner for a generation - shooting UKIP's fox and leaving them just banging on about immigration.


There are problems with the 'ever closer political union' strand (Delors et al), but that is losing support across the EU, in particular in both France and Germany. And I'm afraid some closer union for those in the Euro (luckily not us) does make sense in terms of economic governance.


But I suspect that enough will be gained for the major part of the Tories to recommend a NO vote (i.e. to stay in the EU)

Easy. Apart from lots of other benefits, the primary reasons is that multinationals make their European base here because it gives them an entry point in Europe in an English language environment. That gives the City the huge clout on the world stage - generally London fights it out with New York as the premier world centre for business.


If we leave the EU, those companies would almost certainly have to move camp to somewhere back in the EU. The knock on effect of that would be massive hit on our GDP and our jobs market. In other words, a massive lowering of standard of living in this country and the knock on effect on tax revenues, which would lead to the aforementioned hit on public services.

"Easy. Apart from lots of other benefits, the primary reasons is that multinationals make their European base here because it gives them an entry point in Europe in an English language environment. That gives the City the huge clout on the world stage - generally London fights it out with New York as the premier world centre for business."


Interesting. That contradicts my experience in multi-nationals in the UK for whom the European market is moribund, the focus is US and APAC. I thought the quality of UK workers, the UK legal system and GMT 0 were the big draws...

grabot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting. That contradicts my experience in multi-nationals in the UK for whom the European

> market is moribund, the focus is US and APAC. I thought the quality of UK workers, the UK legal

> system and GMT 0 were the big draws...


But they will still want an EU/EMEA presence - it is still one of the biggest and most important markets. And German workers, the German legal system and GMT+1 would be a more than acceptable alternative.

I am pretty saddened by the election result outside of London. That said, Loz's analysis is not far off. Labour would also have made fairly radical cuts to Social Security. Withdrawal from Europe and the possible break up of the UK are two significant dangers to the UK economy now...Both BTW were made more likely by the Tory win IMO (another reason to rue the outcome).

@derwentgrove - I think most of the more monied recent arrivals to ED are probably Tories.

"But they will still want an EU/EMEA presence - it is still one of the biggest and most important markets. And German workers, the German legal system and GMT+1 would be a more than acceptable alternative."



Agreed. But, equally it would offer an oppotunity for the UK to open up trade globally, liberalise the labour market and generally reduce the burden of regulation and as such make it a more attractive prospect. A relatively small proportion of our GDP is gained from Europe and we run a massive trade deficit with the rest of Europe. This http://www.europarl.org.uk/resource/static/files/global-vision-paper-lr.pdf rather long and complex analysis demonstrates that as far as business is concerned it would probably be a relatively neutral thing. The head of Deutsche bank may say otherwise, but the heads of banks have got a lot of things wrong in recent years. However, for Brexit to succeed a certain amount of preparation would be needed, trade deals etc.

Grabot I agree with the trade thing generally - it's a red herring, the French and Germans will trade with us whatever we do as we are a massive market to them. The argument about trade is from the economic illiterate. But, where I agree with Loz is on the inward investment thing. This is a significant contributor of high end employment to London especially but not just in banking etc but also in high end manufacturing think Airbus, Honda, Nissan, etc.


For the OP try not to live your life believing the propaganda on social media. The state will still be massive by the next GE, the NHS will still exist and my suspicion is that we'll still have a budget defeceit. Wouldn't have been much different under Labour but they'd have stalled investment with their populist anti-business nonsense and done very little to balance our books. They would have also restricted our choice as parents on education because, you know, they know best what,s good for my kids. Personally I wish the coalition had carried on but I,m glad useless Labour aren't in.

The bashing the 'rich, thing was tedious and dangerous too - when I can be arsed I'll go and check but the top 30,000 earners in the UK contribute a staggering % of our overall income tax ( something like 10%) so the fallacy that they aren't somehow pulling their weight that Red Ed was bandying around is just that. Populist nonsense.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The bashing the 'rich, thing was tedious and

> dangerous too - when I can be arsed I'll go and

> check but the top 30,000 earners in the UK

> contribute a staggering % of our overall income

> tax ( something like 10%) so the fallacy that they

> aren't somehow pulling their weight that Red Ed

> was bandying around is just that. Populist

> nonsense.



You shouldnt worry too much about 30,00.Yes, its a big number on the face of it, but for safety sake, I have doubled it to include the tiggy legg bourkes and minor aristos and stuck in another 20 K for military officers to make the number a cool 100,000. Thats a big number, but when you consider that the average body is just under 0.5 of a cubic metre, the hole needed to accomodate this many expired parasites is remarkably small. Think of it in terms of a handful of doulble decked buses or a football field- its easily doable in a few days if we all pull together. Im sure Mao has an oft used quote on this that we could gerrymander to make it easier to swallow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They are very good
    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...