Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just wondered if anyone else is struggling with the outcome of the election and the prospect of another 5 years of this regime? I had such hope for change and now I fear that if change ever does come it will be too late. The welfare state and public services will have been well and truly dismantled in 5 years time and we will need a truly radical opposition to rebuild them. Anyone else feeling similarly downhearted?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/59824-post-election-blues/
Share on other sites

Nope. All the scare-story hoo-har over Tories "dismantling" the welfare state, public services, NHS, etc, etc, won't come to pass. Yes, they'll be cut back, but Labour would have done that too. And I guarantee you that in five years time there will still be an NHS and a welfare state.


A much, much worse situation would have been had we been saddled with an unstable minority government and back at the polls before the year was out.


I'd be more worried if I were you to make sure that the upcoming referendum keeps us in the EU. Pulling out of the EU would be an absolutely economic disaster that will have a massive knock-on effect on the services you mention.

I'm rather in favour of the referendum, with luck (and unlike the Scottish one) it will put the issue on the back-burner for a generation - shooting UKIP's fox and leaving them just banging on about immigration.


There are problems with the 'ever closer political union' strand (Delors et al), but that is losing support across the EU, in particular in both France and Germany. And I'm afraid some closer union for those in the Euro (luckily not us) does make sense in terms of economic governance.


But I suspect that enough will be gained for the major part of the Tories to recommend a NO vote (i.e. to stay in the EU)

Easy. Apart from lots of other benefits, the primary reasons is that multinationals make their European base here because it gives them an entry point in Europe in an English language environment. That gives the City the huge clout on the world stage - generally London fights it out with New York as the premier world centre for business.


If we leave the EU, those companies would almost certainly have to move camp to somewhere back in the EU. The knock on effect of that would be massive hit on our GDP and our jobs market. In other words, a massive lowering of standard of living in this country and the knock on effect on tax revenues, which would lead to the aforementioned hit on public services.

"Easy. Apart from lots of other benefits, the primary reasons is that multinationals make their European base here because it gives them an entry point in Europe in an English language environment. That gives the City the huge clout on the world stage - generally London fights it out with New York as the premier world centre for business."


Interesting. That contradicts my experience in multi-nationals in the UK for whom the European market is moribund, the focus is US and APAC. I thought the quality of UK workers, the UK legal system and GMT 0 were the big draws...

grabot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Interesting. That contradicts my experience in multi-nationals in the UK for whom the European

> market is moribund, the focus is US and APAC. I thought the quality of UK workers, the UK legal

> system and GMT 0 were the big draws...


But they will still want an EU/EMEA presence - it is still one of the biggest and most important markets. And German workers, the German legal system and GMT+1 would be a more than acceptable alternative.

I am pretty saddened by the election result outside of London. That said, Loz's analysis is not far off. Labour would also have made fairly radical cuts to Social Security. Withdrawal from Europe and the possible break up of the UK are two significant dangers to the UK economy now...Both BTW were made more likely by the Tory win IMO (another reason to rue the outcome).

@derwentgrove - I think most of the more monied recent arrivals to ED are probably Tories.

"But they will still want an EU/EMEA presence - it is still one of the biggest and most important markets. And German workers, the German legal system and GMT+1 would be a more than acceptable alternative."



Agreed. But, equally it would offer an oppotunity for the UK to open up trade globally, liberalise the labour market and generally reduce the burden of regulation and as such make it a more attractive prospect. A relatively small proportion of our GDP is gained from Europe and we run a massive trade deficit with the rest of Europe. This http://www.europarl.org.uk/resource/static/files/global-vision-paper-lr.pdf rather long and complex analysis demonstrates that as far as business is concerned it would probably be a relatively neutral thing. The head of Deutsche bank may say otherwise, but the heads of banks have got a lot of things wrong in recent years. However, for Brexit to succeed a certain amount of preparation would be needed, trade deals etc.

Grabot I agree with the trade thing generally - it's a red herring, the French and Germans will trade with us whatever we do as we are a massive market to them. The argument about trade is from the economic illiterate. But, where I agree with Loz is on the inward investment thing. This is a significant contributor of high end employment to London especially but not just in banking etc but also in high end manufacturing think Airbus, Honda, Nissan, etc.


For the OP try not to live your life believing the propaganda on social media. The state will still be massive by the next GE, the NHS will still exist and my suspicion is that we'll still have a budget defeceit. Wouldn't have been much different under Labour but they'd have stalled investment with their populist anti-business nonsense and done very little to balance our books. They would have also restricted our choice as parents on education because, you know, they know best what,s good for my kids. Personally I wish the coalition had carried on but I,m glad useless Labour aren't in.

The bashing the 'rich, thing was tedious and dangerous too - when I can be arsed I'll go and check but the top 30,000 earners in the UK contribute a staggering % of our overall income tax ( something like 10%) so the fallacy that they aren't somehow pulling their weight that Red Ed was bandying around is just that. Populist nonsense.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The bashing the 'rich, thing was tedious and

> dangerous too - when I can be arsed I'll go and

> check but the top 30,000 earners in the UK

> contribute a staggering % of our overall income

> tax ( something like 10%) so the fallacy that they

> aren't somehow pulling their weight that Red Ed

> was bandying around is just that. Populist

> nonsense.



You shouldnt worry too much about 30,00.Yes, its a big number on the face of it, but for safety sake, I have doubled it to include the tiggy legg bourkes and minor aristos and stuck in another 20 K for military officers to make the number a cool 100,000. Thats a big number, but when you consider that the average body is just under 0.5 of a cubic metre, the hole needed to accomodate this many expired parasites is remarkably small. Think of it in terms of a handful of doulble decked buses or a football field- its easily doable in a few days if we all pull together. Im sure Mao has an oft used quote on this that we could gerrymander to make it easier to swallow.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd reread what you posted and try to summarise.  It just comes across as a rant.
    • Just shows, to me, once proud to be a citizen of UK.. now.. well if we pay/contribute to services - nhs, police, fire etc and folk who have made this there home - no matter what creed or culture.. for the love c of God, can someone  please explain to me.. how we have working royals who like them or not, have tried and continue to actually support and make a change and then we have Andrew.. who just destroys everything.. not just him, or royalty but his own children..  I had great admiration for The Queen - and respect.. as have a huge number of people.. but.. these old traditions where gosh.. live rent free and can’t get chucked out until I believe 2070? From what I scanned..well he has and continues to have it all.. has to go thru what old rules? Etc.  doubt very much he has even kept the upkeep maintenance up on his abode.. and do the shite keeps on pulling up.. What has Andrew done for UK or for that matter since he was 20?? Do please tell me       Totally off topic, before anyone jumps down my throat.. I just do not get how anyone is proud to be British at this point in time. Whoever is in power, seems to be able to help themselves to the public purse with no redress at all - Covid is a great example of lining of pockets.. Millions  given to Rowanda, so one is led to believe, to help with refugee problem and one can’t get a plane load off!  I simply do not get it at all. Use of food banks in UK growing yearly, homeless as well, nhs, police, fire service etc all on their knees..        
    • Have applied the green roof at a number of properties and no issues you are concerned about detected. Have issues with cats defecating in the vicinity, however, they are not selecting the green roof specifically. Use decent compost, slow release fertiliser specific for green roofs, and lay it methodically not leaving blank patches. It looks amazing when cared for and adds value.  
    • Some suggestions for mandatory action might include:- 1. Permit retailers to display facial images on the premises  of previous offenders at their local store. 2. Sound an alert and display images on screens inside the store when the FR flags up a person entering who is on the national database of shoplifters. 3. Physically bar recognised shoplifters from the premises. Should they attempt to force entry then charges should be pressed under aggravated trespass, which  a criminal offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. 4. Change the law to allow retailers to have enhanced powers of citizens arrest. What would you suggest? The UK seems to have the most lenient policy towards shoplifting , probably because of other demands on the police force. On the plus side, they may have more time for it now that non-crime hate incidents will no longer be investigated. Other countries, such as the USA have much more sever punishment as does Singapore where repeat offenders or aggravated cases can be sentenced to up to 3 years in prison, a fine, or both.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...