Jump to content

Recommended Posts

life is so erratic (or should that read Southwark is so...?)


there's a rash of bendy alien bo lacs ones appearing around Choumert Road area

and I mean a RASH... in one patch, were there were 4 lampposts, there are now 8!

Heathrow new runway here we come...

If you mean number 6 next to the Old Man of Kent - then i am afraid that you should prepare for HELL. It is the same idiot builder and owner of the property who did the shop next to the florist and opposite Ayres. That was taken down to reveal a large hideous plastic front window for a house and two hideous plastic front doors either side. Now they have errected a metal fence, yes a metal fence on the pathway and have got away with it.


If anyone from the council is reading this they may want to stop this building work before this IDIOT takes down his green corriated screen to reveal another monstrousity. This is why the shop front is covered so by the time he finishes fucking up another nice shop front on Nunhead Lane it is too late. Between this idiot and the Nunhead Plumbers they have managed to fuck up about 7-8 shops on the Lane. I think the council should find some balls and sort it out.



ref the regeneration of bellenden road.... it was the council who actively 'encouraged' dreadful planning...

ie provided funding/links to hideous signage design/designers/recommending of dire plastic 'Dickensian' style facades etc... so Allfornun, beware the idea of Southwark "finding some balls", stepping in to prevent disasters or having any understanding what looks right and what doesn't!

http://img1.photographersdirect.com/img/38/wm/pd2186948.jpg

and LOOK at the lights!!!!

think 'cross park fence aesthetic' - Goose Green

remember stainless steel colour coded "welcome to..." posts which were neither use nor ornamaent (as my Yorkshire friend says


i could go on but.... leave it you to think of all the other ones....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...