Jump to content

Recommended Posts

more in response to ???? remark but meaning if son that studied in secondary school in Ghana is concerned, most secondary education in Equatorial African countries is private.


Diane Abbot may have other children of course who attended private school in this country which I am not aware of. I was referring to the one son I know of who Diane chose to have educated in Ghana rather than here in the U.K

pipsky2008 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> more in response to ???? remark but meaning if son

> that studied in secondary school in Ghana is

> concerned, most secondary education in Equatorial

> African countries is private.

>

> Diane Abbot may have other children of course who

> attended private school in this country which I am

> not aware of. I was referring to the one son I

> know of who Diane chose to have educated in Ghana

> rather than here in the U.K



So The City of London School is in Ghana is it?

She is a ridiculous figure essentially her message for years was 'private schools are totally wrong, especially if you are Labour like me.....oh until I want to send my son to one & then it's totally ok & my defense is that he might have got into a gang at a state school..'

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm trying to decide if she would be a better

> option than George Galloway....bring back the

> Monster Raving Loonies please...at least they

> didn't try to pretend that are sane. (btw I've

> never voted Labour and I'm not about to start now)


They never went away. Call themselves OMRLP a lot now

They have 7 councillors


Galloway is dangerous as he does speak well.

I find Diane Abbott as annoying, ingratiating and generally as shallow and bleughhh as, say, Robert Elms.

She is a shameful hypocrite.


Incidentally, regarding her sending her kid to Ghana for education, I have heard of families doing this because they know their kids will be caned when they are naughty; something that is not allowed here (anymore)!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...