Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I didn't manage to catch all of this, but saw the last half and was mesmerised. Amazingly haunting and incredibly still and becalmed. The lead lead actress is something special. There is a scene about an hour in where the girl absconds from the care home and goes walk about in night-time Nottingham that was truly memorable. About ten minutes long, with no dialogue or voiced narrative - just perfect images and soundtrack saying more than any diatribe.


You can see the whole film on the Channel 4 website; here

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6337-the-unloved-channel-4-last-night/
Share on other sites

I watched all of it. It was unremittingly bleak and not exactly Sunday night viewing.


It was certainly well acted and had aesthetic charm, if you will, but I felt the storyline dragged and the script too minimal to sustain a full two hours. It did however highlighted an area of society I think many of us turn a blind-eye to and should be applauded for that.


On reflection, my biggest issue was that it was directed by Samantha Morten, a successful actress. It was based on her own experiences and made me keep having to try and forget that the girl on screen would go on to be just fine. A tricky one to pull off.


On balance though, I think it is what Channel 4 do best and exemplifies intelligent film making rather than mind-numbing reality, property, How-clean-is-your-celebrity nonsense that populates BBC1 and ITV all too often.

Just fine in the sense of a two year hiatus because of a nervous breakdown based upon her childhood experinces. Agree though that it wasn't right for a tired Sunday night.


If we just make this a last night on channel four thread, did anyone catch 1066? I thought it was rather good at giving you a sense of what Britain would have been like. It never occurwd to me that Stamford Bridge really would have been that piddly!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Very happy to add my recommendation for Leon, who has now helped me out twice. Prompt, efficient and helpful.
    • Today we are seeing the impact of increased taxes (employers NI) with tje UK unemployment rate rising  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxrp7znkdlo Unfortunately, to increase tax burdens will see the economy stall or a recession, as Angelina says, cutting spending, whilst painful short term, is a good way to bring down government borrowing.  True, we don't want to see cuts to services but there are other areas of government spending that can be reduced and with AI impacting all jobs across all businesses, maybe it will also reduce overall staffing costs. 
    • or cut costs.  The cost of debt is a huge burden, it cannot be increased.
    • Yes, they should clearly have been more honest on taxes before the election and not backed themselves into a corner. After 14 years of mismanagement and decline, they have to invest and at the same time start to bring borrowing down (otherwise they continues to be at the mercy of the bond markets). Continued cuts / degrading of public services is counter productive (a successful economy and society needs good infrastructure, education and health care).  The single biggest thing they could do to immediately improve growth would be to rejoin the single market, but I appreciate that is difficult politically.  So if you can't significantly boost growth short term, can't cut too much further, and need to raise money without borrowing, that only really leaves taxation.    Of course, where best to target those taxes - that's the real question.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...