Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What do we think.

Not that it will make a difference, they're going ahead with President Clinton loving it.

But what do WE think.

I went to the Building Design place on Store Street off Tottenham Court Road, and saw the plans there.

It all looks very positive and modern and gleaming and of course, "green". I wonder if President Clinton has actually seen it as it was?

I saw a map on one site where the traffic coming up Walworth Road will have to do a right at Heygate Street and hang a left at the top joining everything else from New Kent Road, because the roundabout it would normally head for will be pedestrianised at that point.

More information.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6343-elephant-and-castle-regeneration/
Share on other sites

Can our Family have My Great Aunt's 5 Houses back please, that she received a pittance for, in Faraday Street/Westmoreland Road to build The Aylesbury Estate?


Thanks for destroying the Walworth Community back in The 1960's with The Heygate/Aylesbury Developments, by the way...bustards....


It was the "largest Estate in Europe" at the time, don't you know?


Something to be proud of, for sure and the Architects were even far-sighted enough to provide dark walkways and hidden gangways for, er, gangs, to operate and they did, they most certainly did....bustards, as I said....

When the estates went up, Tony, was there not a sense of progress and a strong desire to live there amongst the locals? I know in other areas this was the case. Interior bathrooms, separate bedrooms, all that sort of thing, perceived at the time as a vast improvement on the exiting conditions.


Any insights?

Looks like SOuthwark Council made a massive architectural error in those days.

My ex boyfriend's Mum lived in Portland Street in a back to back which was torn down also.


BUT we have to look forward and you never know, they may not just get it right with these plans and high rises, but it could be a world leading architectural centre of excellence. (Which means everyone will learn from the mistakes THEY make!)


I'm cautiously optimistic, I think. Long as we can still get to the bridges without being squeezed in to one lane to do so.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What did she need five houses for TLS?


One for her. One for her Son. One for her Daughter. One for her Husband ( they never did get on) and most importantly, by some considerable distance, one for me when I became older so that I would not be saddled with the ruddy mortgage I've had for 26 years now..B)...


The back of our Garden backed onto the back of my Aunts and everybody knew and helped and looked out for each other in those tight Terraced Houses


Twas a great community spirit but the planners soon put an end to that nonsense and most Walworthians moved out to Welling, Sidcup and Bexley.


p.s. When I said "everybody" used to help etc that did not apply to Bobby Holland who used to go round murdering people but apart from one or two bad eggs....

Ted Max Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When the estates went up, Tony, was there not a

> sense of progress and a strong desire to live

> there amongst the locals? I know in other areas

> this was the case. Interior bathrooms, separate

> bedrooms, all that sort of thing, perceived at the

> time as a vast improvement on the exiting

> conditions.


This started the mass exodus to The Kent Suburbs Ted.


The thought and prospect of living in Tower Blocks, surrounded on all sides, by other Tower Blocks was, understandably, unappealing to many.


Of course, you are correct in saying that there was certainly, interior improvements, like Indoor Loos, for example, and many gave it a go.


To be absolutely fair to the designers and architects there was very little street robbery in those days ( I truly don't remember any incident at all) and so they were not to know that things were going to drastically change, for the worse, in that respect and, of course, it became a Muggers Paradise..........got to the stage where My Aunt was on the 12th Floor and hardly ever went out for fear of using the lifts. She was physically capable for those Tower Blocks became "prisons" for many living above, say, the 3rd Floor.


The Women, in particular, did their business, and they were, effectively, housebound for the rest of the dasy, especially, as the lifts often did not work or were full of urine...I often walked up and down the 12 Floors rather than "take a chance"..


Of course, with the subsequent explosion of crime this accelerated the flight of many of the remaining characters there, to safer pastures..

One of the things the planners didn't realise was the importance of "the street". By having the humans up in the sky, and the cars all down at ground level, they were trying to create an improved environment for both. But they ended denying people the interaction they were trying to create - the sheer daily "how do you do" of buying a paper, walking to the bus stop etc. The sort of social breakdown you describe has too many causes to lay at this one door, but it's an acknowledged factor.


What I was trying to get at was if the planners' post-war enthusiasm, naivety, patrician scheming (call it what you will) was shared in any sense by the residents at the time. You suggest not - which is a big lesson for the current plans. (Southwark claims it has 75% resident apporval for its schemes, I think).

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can our Family have My Great Aunt's 5 Houses back

> please, that she received a pittance for, in

> Faraday Street/Westmoreland Road to build The

> Aylesbury Estate?

>

> Thanks for destroying the Walworth Community back

> in The 1960's with The Heygate/Aylesbury

> Developments, by the way...bustards....

>

> It was the "largest Estate in Europe" at the time,

> don't you know?

>

> Something to be proud of, for sure and the

> Architects were even far-sighted enough to provide

> dark walkways and hidden gangways for, er, gangs,

> to operate and they did, they most certainly

> did....bustards, as I said....


I lived in a block of flats called Innis House in East Street and watched those old hoses being demolished to make way for the abomination that is the Aylesbury estate. It ripped the community apart.

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Will the architect fall on his sword this time as

> well?


1) Are you saying there's knife crime in Walworth?

2) And no, not this time, because this time it is not one architect to blame. It is all Committees nowadays, and as mentioned above the Council has made sure that The People are Consulted so it's their fault.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

I lived in a block of flats called Innis House in East Street and watched those old hoses being demolished to make way for the abomination that is the Aylesbury estate. It ripped the community apart.


Just saw your reference to East Street on another thread M8.


You are ONE MILLION PER CENT right by the way....


p.s There was something so magical about that area that, almost everybody, that you bump into has very fond memories.


How is this for a contrast?


I was going back today, if the weather was fine, for my monthly sentimental journey ( 26 years after moving out):)) but as its windy I will drive 25 minutes the other way to High Elms Country Park and Golf Course, Nr Farnborough, with its rolling hills, woods and fields and my 4 West Highland Terriers will love it. ( I only discovered this fabulous place yesterday .


Bit different to The Lane, though:)

Flatten it all and build a suburb of 3-4 bedroom houses that gives people the chance to live with some form a human dignity. To hell with business opportunities.


Get someone from 100 years ago to design it because for some reason ever since the 1st world war there hasn?t been an architect capable of designing anything that looks good for longer than about a month.

I think the new regeneration looks OK. I've been keeping an eye on it for a while now.


I have a feeling that some of the changes may restrict traffic flow, but other than that I think the area will become a lot more pleasant (let's face it, it can't really get much worse).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I struggled with the parakeets literally decimating the bird feeders within an hour.  I tried squirrel proof ones to see if they helped, but they jammed their claws in the mechanism to stop it closing.  Then the pigeons managed to do the same.  I spent a long time researching the best ideas and came across something on Pinterest.  Someone had used a metal dog cage and attached it to a wooden platform.  So that's what I did!  Once set up, you just hang the feeders inside.  Large birds like pigeons and parakeets cannot get inside.  I get all the small birds, plus starlings.  Not many thrushes or blackbirds around, so have no idea if they could get in.  The squirrels do!  It's amazing watching them slide through narrow gaps.  I also covered the roof of the cage with a piece of plastic to keep the rain off, plus I am just about to replace the cage plastic base with something more mesh like.  It can get a bit gooey after a while, so with mesh, all the dropped seed from the messy goldfinches, will go on to the ground where the pigeons can clear up.  I even added a birdcam.  
    • Yep, of course I do - did you not read the bit from the survey about the noise having a negative impact on foraging bats? And like @Angelina I'm aware it affects other people, and if no one complains then it gives them an argument that's it's all ok.  The tree in question was a cherry that everyone loves, didn't need to be touched, and the council admitted was a mistake and shouldn't have happened.  The council and Gala use the 'local' narrative as a benefit, without any figures to back it up. It is used as an argument for the event to go ahead, when there's no basis of fact. The attendees are clearly not local as they've proved they don't give a **** about the area. The council do tell us where the money is spent - 100% on running the Events dept, and a myriad of unlisted free events. They just don't tell us how much, so that we can make an informed decision on whether the gain is with the pain.  Sorry, what was your point again?
    • Leon came this evening and did a small job.  He was able to fit me, which I’m grateful for.  He arrived when he said he would. Very professional & friendly guy, offered great advice and very reasonable prices.  Highly recommend Leon! 👍  
    • Thanks, that's quite big, isn't it?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...