Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think he has served his time (albeit I am oblivious as to why he was banned, so can't really comment on that).


Any chance of him being allowed back Admin? If he promises to be a good wolf?


I know he was rude on occaision, but I for one found him a great asset to the Fourm - any other BBW forgivers out there?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6352-bigbadwolf-can-we-have-him-back/
Share on other sites

Seemed like an individual who would not sit on the fence, had individual thoughts and said individual things.


Don't think we need a maverick/loose cannon like that on The Good Ship EDF!


If he agrees to be neutered, totally non-controversial and steers a safe middle ground on all topics then its possible the system might allow him back....


We need to all toe the one-party line here...he's not bland enough for my liking.....

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seemed like an individual who would not sit on the

> fence, had individual thoughts and said individual

> things.

>

> Don't think we need a maverick/loose cannon like

> that on The Good Ship EDF!

>


No of course not eh tone just everyone who thinks, speaks and dare I say it LOOKS the same aint that right! ::o How boring that would be!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


BBW is funny and smart, and generally I'm glad to see him on the forum.


But to suggest that anyone who is 'other than bland' gets banned is nonsense. BBW said a lot of things that offended a lot of people - and I'd guess pretty deliberately - so what is Admin supposed to do, just ignore those people that complained?

Haven't a clue why he was given the Spanish archer so can't comment on it.

A time-limited ban with a promise to straighten up and fly right and no crossing fingers would seem reasonable enough.

There seems to be a fair bit of leeway on the forum and Admin usually ban from a specific thread if the silly b*ggers being played get a little too silly, so I'm assuming that BBW had a specific complaint or complaints made about him from individuals that he offended.

I'd like to see him back, I enjoy most of his posts.

KalamityKel Wrote:

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

> > Seemed like an individual who would not sit on

> the fence, had individual thoughts and said individual things. Don't think we need a maverick/loose cannon like that on The Good Ship EDF!


No of course not eh tone just everyone who thinks, speaks and dare I say it LOOKS the same aint that right! ::o How boring that would be!


KK: Its time you accepted the harsh reality of these dictatorial times with good grace.


Look at the benefits of having your every move covered by millions of CCTV Cameras, your every word scanned and approved by the relevant Authorities. There are now zillions of people out there studying your every gesture, every text, every E-Mail and they have YOUR interests at heart.Its not as if its a self-perpetuating Industry, is it.


These people believe zealously in what they are seeing, saying and doing and I,for one, applaud them.


There is no room in Society and most certainly NOT on the EDF for the likes of BBW who can downright cheeky and funny at times, no place at all.


The system MUST always come first for now and in the future and anyone who does not succumb willingly, you should be forced to.


The Orwellian vision is right here, right now.


Accept and Cherish it.


God Bless The Authorities.


p.s You ARE right on the looks though, as I was saying this morning to my friend who visited me, who originally came from Freetown, Sierra Leone. Indeed I shall re-iterate the necessity for us all to look similar to my Jamaican Ladyfriend later when she deigns to wake up and re-join the World.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...