Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I think he has served his time (albeit I am oblivious as to why he was banned, so can't really comment on that).


Any chance of him being allowed back Admin? If he promises to be a good wolf?


I know he was rude on occaision, but I for one found him a great asset to the Fourm - any other BBW forgivers out there?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6352-bigbadwolf-can-we-have-him-back/
Share on other sites

Seemed like an individual who would not sit on the fence, had individual thoughts and said individual things.


Don't think we need a maverick/loose cannon like that on The Good Ship EDF!


If he agrees to be neutered, totally non-controversial and steers a safe middle ground on all topics then its possible the system might allow him back....


We need to all toe the one-party line here...he's not bland enough for my liking.....

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seemed like an individual who would not sit on the

> fence, had individual thoughts and said individual

> things.

>

> Don't think we need a maverick/loose cannon like

> that on The Good Ship EDF!

>


No of course not eh tone just everyone who thinks, speaks and dare I say it LOOKS the same aint that right! ::o How boring that would be!

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


BBW is funny and smart, and generally I'm glad to see him on the forum.


But to suggest that anyone who is 'other than bland' gets banned is nonsense. BBW said a lot of things that offended a lot of people - and I'd guess pretty deliberately - so what is Admin supposed to do, just ignore those people that complained?

Haven't a clue why he was given the Spanish archer so can't comment on it.

A time-limited ban with a promise to straighten up and fly right and no crossing fingers would seem reasonable enough.

There seems to be a fair bit of leeway on the forum and Admin usually ban from a specific thread if the silly b*ggers being played get a little too silly, so I'm assuming that BBW had a specific complaint or complaints made about him from individuals that he offended.

I'd like to see him back, I enjoy most of his posts.

KalamityKel Wrote:

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

> > Seemed like an individual who would not sit on

> the fence, had individual thoughts and said individual things. Don't think we need a maverick/loose cannon like that on The Good Ship EDF!


No of course not eh tone just everyone who thinks, speaks and dare I say it LOOKS the same aint that right! ::o How boring that would be!


KK: Its time you accepted the harsh reality of these dictatorial times with good grace.


Look at the benefits of having your every move covered by millions of CCTV Cameras, your every word scanned and approved by the relevant Authorities. There are now zillions of people out there studying your every gesture, every text, every E-Mail and they have YOUR interests at heart.Its not as if its a self-perpetuating Industry, is it.


These people believe zealously in what they are seeing, saying and doing and I,for one, applaud them.


There is no room in Society and most certainly NOT on the EDF for the likes of BBW who can downright cheeky and funny at times, no place at all.


The system MUST always come first for now and in the future and anyone who does not succumb willingly, you should be forced to.


The Orwellian vision is right here, right now.


Accept and Cherish it.


God Bless The Authorities.


p.s You ARE right on the looks though, as I was saying this morning to my friend who visited me, who originally came from Freetown, Sierra Leone. Indeed I shall re-iterate the necessity for us all to look similar to my Jamaican Ladyfriend later when she deigns to wake up and re-join the World.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry to hear you are having issues. Fwiw, we received a regular letter this week. Maybe it's worth asking at the Dulwich delivery office (it's in West Dulwich, though. Their phone number is 03457740740) to see if there are aware of any issues in your particular area?  I've seen cases in the past were the a particular postie was sick and they didn't cover for them, they just let everything accumulate for a couple of days until the person was back.
    • Mal, it is related to this issue and if you scroll back a few pages you will see that Brockwell was brought up in relation to this (not by me I hasten to add). Do you not think it seems perfectly reasonable for people to be able to reference a neighbouring event - one that is having a number of challenges not too dissimilar to the ones Gala is having?     These sentences from the BrixtonBuzz article I linked seem very pertinent too:  The concern, they argue, is not just about permits, but about the Council’s repeated failure to follow proper planning processes and its habit of acting in the interests of commercial promoters rather than the local community.   And this: The group is now calling on residents to write to their local MP and councillors, accusing the Council of using legal mechanisms to avoid scrutiny.
    • Mal, like it or not, it does have some bearing on other councils. There was an item about it on Times Radio on Sunday - Kate Borsay, a presenter who lives locally, referenced Peckham Rye in relation to the Brockwell case. As the reporter pointed out, local councils will all be talking to each other and closely following how things unfold. If a precedent is set with Brockwell, other councils will be under greater scrutiny. 
    • Why don't you start a new thread about Brockwell Park?  I promise that I won't post on it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...