Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have noticed number of posters in public places, funded by Southwark Council and Southwark NHS, encouraging students to do well in their current and forthcoming exams.


Is this a good use of scarce funds?


I accept many teenagers are reluctant to revise or study as their parent wish - I was the same, My own son is taking exams at present. Balancing encouragement, nagging, bribery and corruption to get him to buckle down and study as I think he should is difficult - and he knows me. The likelihood of a poster impacting on his revision effort and exam results is minimal.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6428-council-spending/
Share on other sites

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Probably a end of financial year,

> spend-it-or-lose-it, silly season wheeze. The

> public sector is always chucking their unspent

> money about this time of year to ensure they

> maintain budgets for next year.



Similarly you often see a load of public service-based publicity posters (particularly police ones, fellow cowering residents of ED) regarding all the good work being done in your area when there's an election looming.

I applaud any campaign that may help highlight the importance of exams and use the the brain for once - anything that tries a different tack from the constant media & marketing onslaught of images that seem to tell the inner city poor can only be consideredm a suiccess if they are Sporting success, cant be a bad thing

Well, I saw this poster and thought it was very touching.


A lot of kids work very hard getting through their exams (while facing a lot of peer pressure telling them it's not cool to be clever) and the only messages they ever get from the adult world are (i) a load of advertising/TV/music telling them to buy cruddy products and see themselves entirely in terms of personal appearance and (ii) officialdom/the papers/adults generally telling them they are a bunch of frightening yobs who ought to be swept off the streets. Maybe I'm being a bit sentimental about the average teen, but I'd have thought looking out of the window of a bus and seeing an advert saying "Good luck in your exams. We're proud of your hard work. Aim high!" might make you feel a bit better about yourself and more inclined to think it's worth putting effort into brainwork.


Sorry to sound pious but well done to whoever at the council thought of it. I bet if it had been a picture of a hoodie carrying a knife and a warning to keep your phone hidden when you're walking the streets, no-one would have complained it was a waste of money...

monyvibescu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, I saw this poster and thought it was very

> touching.

>

> A lot of kids work very hard getting through their

> exams (while facing a lot of peer pressure telling

> them it's not cool to be clever) and the only

> messages they ever get from the adult world are

> (i) a load of advertising/TV/music telling them to

> buy cruddy products and see themselves entirely in

> terms of personal appearance and (ii)

> officialdom/the papers/adults generally telling

> them they are a bunch of frightening yobs who

> ought to be swept off the streets. Maybe I'm being

> a bit sentimental about the average teen, but I'd

> have thought looking out of the window of a bus

> and seeing an advert saying "Good luck in your

> exams. We're proud of your hard work. Aim high!"

> might make you feel a bit better about yourself

> and more inclined to think it's worth putting

> effort into brainwork.

>

> Sorry to sound pious but well done to whoever at

> the council thought of it. I bet if it had been a

> picture of a hoodie carrying a knife and a warning

> to keep your phone hidden when you're walking the

> streets, no-one would have complained it was a

> waste of money...



innit

monyvibescu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having said that, the one thing I will not

> tolerate is youths who say `innit' all the time.

> Don't they realise it just means we elderly folk

> can't understand what they mean? Slovenly, I call

> it.


I am sure your elders and better were appalled when you talked about "far out" & "fab" when you were a nipper.


Bludz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...