Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Are we the only country who have to pay for t.v license, with all the free advertising the estate agents are getting on their property shows etc. the BBC should pay for itself. All repeats,silly skating, dancing, song contest,eurovision,Jonathan Ross,tennis golf football.the list is endless. Then they go and take most of the racing off,and put darts on. If it was ten quid a year yeah fine.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6506-proffessional-mugging/
Share on other sites

It's bad, and worse in summer, to be sure Morag. But in many other countries it's even worse. Italy? Spain? Three hour contest-style shows every bloomin night. No documentaries. Every film dubbed. Programme after programme modelled on Page 3 and Hello. And have you ever watched Venezuelan soap operas?


And there's always the option of opting out completely: you don't have to pay if you don't have equipment that receives broadcast TV. An option I'm seriously considering myself. Though I find a Tivo box goes a long way to finding and recording what I want, meaning I never tune in to live TV.

Iused to watch Bill Oddie, when he had a show on his own, not with the other gobby presenters, they ruined it. Days gone they used to have craft and DIY, now they think we are all flush and want to buy, houses.Do the estate agents, whose houses they are parading, pay for this big hour long programme.,and if they do ,surely that is advertising,so why are we paying,or if not, why are they showing all their properties free.One of my poor old pals, has just been fined for this questionable law. I want value form money. I dont want to plough through every house in the country, I dont want cordon bleau dinners,do you.I just wish they would abolish the licence,And Jonathan ROSS he is so cringeworthy and so unfunny, someone said they wouldnt sack him because he was a mason!

It's not just the telly tho' is it. It's the jolly old world service and Rs 1 2 3 4 5 too.


Frankly I cannot stand the shreiking adverts on the telly or the radio, they make me want to gouge my eyes out and stick them in my ears so I am thankful for the few services that don't have them.

At least we would not have to pay. The BBC is overated at this moment in time, Robin Hood for instance, the way that has been distorted,the timing of programmes running over Its very unprofessional. They worked a lot better when they had less money offof us, They only excel in their period dramas, except the joke that is Robin Hood of course,theres still all the other channels for rubbish, like that, what we dont have to pay.

Morag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> At least we would not have to pay. theres still all the other channels for

> rubbish, like that, what we dont have to pay.


You don't seem to understand that if the license fee was abolished the BBC would turn into all those other rubbish channels.

While I don't believe in God, I do bless the lord for Radio 4. Some bits I can take or leave, such as the farming programme (though I do listen to that on occasion), but there's so much good stuff on there. There is some good public service radio elsewhere in the world, but unusual to find so much good, meaty stuff on a advert-free national channel.

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> While I don't believe in God, I do bless the lord

> for Radio 4. Some bits I can take or leave, such

> as the farming programme (though I do listen to

> that on occasion),


You're missing out there Louisiana, the ongoing story of the BBC beehives has me enthralled, it's what I set my alarm early for.

That and the shipping forecast, which I find sets me up good and proper for the day ahead.

Once I was going to find out what it all actually meant, but decided not to as I thought it would lose its magic then.

Oh yes, when I said I did listen sometimes, I had been listening to that. (I've been learning how to keep bees myself over the last year (with London Beekeepers) and have been planning to get some hives of my own.)

The shipping forecast I've been listening to for many years.

Oh yeah, it's really bad value. Look at all those radio stations, investment in DAB and iPlayer, the outreach work, the drama, the language courses, the GCSE study aids, the world-quality production values....Really is a rip off. Why not spend your money on a Caramac six-pack, some Cresta and relax on your snooker-mogul recliner while you watch Dave TV+1?

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dogger, Fisher, German Bight...

>

> It took me some years to figure out that North

> Utsire and South Utsire referred to North and

> South Uist respectively.

>

> Did you mourn the passing of Finisterre? The end

> of the world.


Don't Loisiana, the end of the world as i knew it.

Nero, you're forgetting the commissioning of new radio drama... and of course services to public information about farming, health etc. (The Archers), knowledge sharing with related professionals in relevant sectors, training and education (including online resources), the reinvigoration of the entire Salford economy...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...