Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The soon to be released digital Britain report will effectively draw the lines around what is good for government and state. The BBC will be handed even more power, effectively already heavily indebted to the government, it's online news service will become even 'softer' if that's possible, there will also be a stern warning about expenses - just for the headlines !

To counter this they will claim that freedom of speech and democracy, not to mention slightly rebellious broadcasting, is being saved as they throw a lifeline to Channel4. They will omit to mention that Channel4 has long been pushed into the bosom of the BBC, having been overrun by ex BBC staff and government pressure in the run up to the funding issue. ITN the a thorn in the side of government SPIN will be given a sink or swim option and ITV will just get decimated. So Murdoch on one side and the spectre of Whitehall on the other....... meanwhile we will all continue to sleep.

AllforNun, the Digital Britain final report is due to be published 16 June. The consultation period - during which members of the public were free to contribute - is over. In the meantime, it seems a little fruitless the speculate about what things might be said in something that hasn't yet been published.

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No speculation spank monkey and do me a favour -

>

> "the consultation period - during which members of

> the public were free to contribute - is over"

>

> What the hell are you ? i am intrigued ....animal,

> vegetable or mineral !


Some days are animal. And some I'm vegetable. B)

Today, being surrounded by chard seedlings and wind-up devices, I'm mainly on the vegetable-mineral axis.


But it is true that there was a first report, and then a consultation period, and now the final report will be published (unfortunately while I am parked in a tent on a farm - so very vegetable - and so far removed from all that is digital). I do believe it's more productive to turn over the living - paper, vegetable - entrails of reports, and indeed to protest vehemently as is often required, rather than to speculate about what some future report might possibly say.

"unfortunately while I am parked in a tent on a farm - "


How strange i am also in a Tipi at an obscure but cool acoustic festival, the joy of technology. Anyway as for digestion, i have already told you so start digesting, the time for speculation has passed.


Hows the weather where you are ? i think there is a storm brewing here, my fairy lanterns are going to get buggered.

Oops there it is !


Ben Bradshaw, a former BBC journalist, has been appointed the new culture, media and sport secretary. Bradshaw's appointment at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport means ministerial responsibility for the BBC will be held by one of its former employees.



Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg Bilderberg

I notice today that the BBC have made a very public dressing down of it's 'suddenly' overpaid presenters ? maybe this report has already got out in the open as has been suggested ? Interesting that the managerial teams are only getting a pay freeze while they expect others to take a pay cut ! That's very MP esque of them.

Surpise ! not.


so the beeb are being asked to give up, if my calculations are right 3.6% of there annual budget of 3.6billion ! and none of that money was programming money it was extra money that was donated by the government to pay for the cost of switching to digital. Christ the state sponsored mouthpiece remains virtually untouched.

so there you go - BBC gets to keep it's 3.6 and rising Billion and everyone else gets fucked or fudged and we get charged 50p and month for 2meg broadband, ive got 8meg now so so what !


And why because the government think that the 27% of the population who regard the BBC as truly the british Empire ( do not give a shit about the the 73% who would not really notice if the beeb only got 2.6 billion a year and 1billion went else where !


lets take to the streets alah iran !

no just the beeb ! and the focus my friend is nothing more sinister than the fact they get 3.6billion a year they are a law unto themselves the head of SUBTITLING gets 547.000 pounds a year and they bleat on about market rates that they them selves set. Wait till you see there expenses, which you won't as a controlled media is second only to a nuclear device !


much love


AFN

oh sorry how silly of me because of course you cannot as....


The corporation is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act where information related to its "journalism, art or literature" is concerned.


yes that's how well hidden they are ! this includes all info by the way

Just to set the record straight, the BBC has only 744 senior managers. Of these, just 13 have salaries over ?250,000 a year; only 83 earn over ?160,000; a bare 172 have salaries above ?130,000; and 343 of them are scraping along on pittances of not much more than ?100,000.


As for the director-general Mark Thompson, no reasonable person could grudge him his ?816,000 salary


LAST JULY yes LAST JULY (who new about the financial crisis ) - the BBC awarded modest pay rises of up to ?107,000!!!!! each to executive directors. there are 10 of them so that is a cool million ! they are so executive they missed the fact that we were nose diving into a recession but WTF do they care, because the licence fee does not change and in fact during a recession is worth way more !!!

....round 2....the crushing ego of the BBC II


British broadcasting is sliding towards monochromic mediocrity. Counterintuitive as it may sound, the best way to rescue it would be to cut funding for the BBC and share out the proceeds of the licence fee.


Someone, sometime, however, will have to admit that the old model of public service broadcasting is broken. As long as it continues to be held hostage to a BBC monopoly, there is nothing to be done.


The ferocity with which it defends its ground is something to behold. Thus a recent Tory proposal to freeze the licence fee for a year in view of the straitened economic times elicited the hysterical response that the BBC's political independence was under threat.


read on at http:/www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e255a868-5a0e-11de-b687-00144feabdc0.html


So here is ferocity coming back at you .......politicians AFN says.......... " start carving them barstards UP ! "

I've got the BBC's annual report, and there's no executive role for a 'Head of Subtitling' or 'Head of Access', and no salary assigned.


Is it possible you've been getting your info third hand, and you can't differentiate between fact and fiction?


The Board roles are 'Head of Vision' (TV) etc.


The salaries are predominantly in the 300k range, and whilst high, they do reflect well aganist the salaries of individuals running equivalent businesses in the private sector.


For example Peter Chernin of News Corp last year received US$27.4m in annual salary for being the COO (not the owner, mind, just another board member).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...