Jump to content

fish chipsand more...... on east dulwich road


claudina

Recommended Posts

Normally when you walk past a Fish & Chip shop you are usually greeted with a wonderful aroma which makes

you hungry and want to eat Fish & Chips.


Walking past Fish and Chips and More something is missing. ? Have they installed very efficient extractors

and aroma filters..


DulwichFox

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> spider69 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Yes. The fish shop on Bellenden Road does

> > excellent rock and chips.

>

> Which one? Never seen Codfellas open (at least not

> recently).


opens lunchtime onwards

  • 2 months later...

We have been using this place for fish and chips since it opened. When it first opened, the quality was very high but over the past 6-12 months (we probably have fish and chips every couple of months) the quality has been steadily going downhill.


Last night our fish was thin, lacked a flaky texture, the batter was greasy and had a chemical-like taste; the chips were soggy and poor quality. Added to this I could see the staff rubbing their faces, touching their hair, etc and then preparing/ serving food. So, due to a combination of poor quality and hygiene we won't be going again.

Saus01 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We have been using this place for fish and chips

> since it opened. When it first opened, the quality

> was very high but over the past 6-12 months (we

> probably have fish and chips every couple of

> months) the quality has been steadily going

> downhill.

>

Last night our fish was thin, lacked a flaky

> texture, the batter was greasy and had a

> chemical-like taste; the chips were soggy and poor

> quality. Added to this I could see the staff

> rubbing their faces, touching their hair, etc and

> then preparing/ serving food. So, due to a

> combination of poor quality and hygiene we won't

> be going again.


Thin fish that is not flaky is likely to be Pollock (a cheap alternative) some fish shops are passing

on illegally as Cod. Fish advertised as Cod has to BE Cod.


It can be identified by a pinkish colour.. and a mushy wet texture.


DulwichFox

  • 2 weeks later...
I find Sema on Underhill road, near Exhibition really good. they seem to be really anal about cleanliness and cook the fish there and then for you. You can even phone them up and order and go collect so you do not have to wait around. The only word of warning is that sometimes i have caught them trying to pass off a small/medium cod as a large so i always ask them when they serve me to make sure. The portions are big though

SEMA's was always my favourite but I suspect that on occasion they have substituted Cod with Pollock..


I have questioned them on this issue and they deny this practice..


Look out for thin fish with pinkish mushy flesh.. Cod has a pure white flaky texture..


Foxy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...