Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Some facts. There's at least one Gym in the video. There IS a playground. The building's internal accomodation exceeds current standards for 900 pupils.


I know some of didn't want a boys school, I know some of us don't trust Harris or Academies in general but its what we've got which is better than nothing. I hope you all take a keen interest , get involved, contribute in anyway you can when it opens.

  • 8 months later...

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, it's almost unveiled. I was surprised by

> how much I like it.

>

> Are the windmills on top decorative or functional?


Apparently its at the end of my road - But I have not seen it.

We have to accept now that the school is here. Many of our friend's children will have to attend it (mainly because they did not get their chosen school). I feel, we should, as a community, accept and support it. Nothing we can say is going to change that up to 900 boys are going to be attending this school so it is up to us all as a community to proud of it and make it the best school it can be.


And, for those who don't want it on their doorstep, if it does succeed, it will certainly increase their house prices!

I really hope it works (and i live very close to it). But i still can't get my head around 900 kids all crammed on that disproportionally small site. Triple the previous amount ... Someone mentioned earlier that the park was out of bounds - so where on earth are they going to play/exercise outside ?

The Academy ?Coop? LMAO.


900 Battery Children cooped up in the Harris Academy.


Dulwich College has playing fields in abundance and the poor sporty kids of South London have the Harris Academy.


Southwark?s brilliant Planning system.



If they had any sense they would compulsory purchase industrial land around Burgess Park reclaim the land for sports fields and build an academy there. No one would miss the industrial units.


But NO let?s squeeze it in next to Peckham rye?


The site of the Harris academy should have been retirement flats freeing up some of the boroughs large housing stock which is occupied by OAPs holding back family housing.



The Southwark PLAN Like many local council plans is a JOKE!


Short sighted and as always falls way short of benefiting the boroughs residents in a humane way.


THE BATTER EDUCATION SYSTEM IS HERE!


No virtual tour required.

e- dealer

The building's internal accomodation exceeds current standards for 900 pupils.

Not doubting the vaiidity of your comment but I would be interested in more details ,have you a link giving current standards ? And some idea of the Academy's internal specification to make a comparison ?

Mmm .I can see it's going to be tricky to track down,especially since the proposed numbers of students went up considerably during the course of the planning .

Of course I realise it will all conform to planning regs - just wondered how it was worked out and how the building meets the requirements.

Well it's (nearly) here now so there it is.


In six or seven years time we'll no doubt be taking a look around - with an open mind.


Doing the rounds of the local primaries recently was an interesting exercise in itself, unearthing as it did a bubbling cauldron of assumption, prejudice and snobbery (ours, that of others). If we learned anything from that, it's that you only know by looking for yourself.

ontheedge,you are ontheball!

Horrific building, it will ruin the enjoyment that we know of Peckham Rye Park - which is a massive shame, it was only this morning I was talking to the gardeners, thanking them for the hard work in making the park such a delight.

Why shouldn't they use the park??? I can see there could be potential problems but surely if there were rules in place then there shouldn't be unmanageable 'problems'.


What sort of image of our youth do we have when we assume that they're going to cause problems. Isn't the park there for everyone to enjoy???

Peckham Rye Park has long been used for school children as a sports facility, When I was at school we used to get a coach there, I don't see why that should be a problem now. It's not as if they're going to let 900 boys out in the park at the same time, unsupervised to do what they like and as someone else said, why should local kids not be allowed to use the park, it's a public space is it not?

It is a great shame it has no outdoor space, but with a desperate need for secondary places in Southwark and little room to build a school especially in ED, it looks like they are trying to make the best of what they have.


Will the boys school not be sharing any of the facilities of the girls school across the park?

I vote for underground sports fields dig the rye concrete it like a basement/car park, then cover it back over with the same turf etc.


Not good for football but ok for track and field sports etc they could be bussed out to the near continent for team sports.


I guess the general thinking was for dart throwing snooker playing weight lifting acrobats with abilities in dance as a sideline.

I was on the planning committee that decided to grant planning permission.

I did ask at the time whether the Academy could be allowed to use the common/park but in exchange allow its changing rooms to be used at the weekend. This would allow all those unsightly shipping containers to be removed.

I was told that the friends of Peckham Rye Park at that time were against such a concept and the applicant didn't want to rock the boat.

Another thing worth adding is that there won't imediately be 900 boys on site, the school is being filled one form per year, the first intake was last September so if/when it opens this September there will only be 2 year groups there, and the school will fill gradually.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Whilst I agree, I have been thinking about this recently in relation to some of the other posts on here about anti social behaviour. We are all products of our upbringing - our experiences at home, school and beyond - plus whatever we have inherited genetically which might affect our behaviour (the nature/nurture thing). So in this case, if people haven't been brought up to love and appreciate trees and other wild things, plus as you say they may be deeply unhappy (or have other undiagnosed issues) it's easy to see how they could have ended up doing this. Also, it's possible they had quite low intelligence and didn't really grasp what they were doing and the effect it would have on so many other people. But that's just surmise and possibly completely wrong. From what I've read about it, they seemed to be two mates egging each other on, like two big kids. I'm not for a minute excusing what they did, and it's right they should be punished, but I really hope they might get some sort of rehabilitation in prison (it would  be appropriate to have them do some kind of community service like planting saplings, wouldn't it, or working in woodland conservation). And the same goes for phone robbers and shoplifters (rehabilitation, not planting saplings), though for SOME  shoplifters there might also be other issues at play, not excluding poverty. Sorry Jasonlondon,  I've gone off at a real tangent here, lucky it's in the lounge! Oh, and then there's a whole philosophical discussion to be had about free will and determinism ..... 🤣🤣🤣
    • Thanks! I'll find out in a few weeks when I get the results! It was one of those disconcerting things where a disembodied voice keeps booming  at you to breathe in and hold it, then breathe normally. Apart from that it was OK, all completely painless. I imagine there will be quite a few people going from ED, though I presume it covers the whole Southwark area 
    • Two men behind ‘senseless’ felling of Sycamore Gap tree jailed for more than four years Good to see these two jailed today for four years. There’s something deeply disturbing about people who destroy trees—any tree. Whether it’s a centuries-old landmark or a sapling in a quiet park, trees are living beings that offer beauty, shade, and life. The men who cut down the Sycamore Gap tree are a stark example of how far some people will go to lash out at something peaceful and meaningful. People who harm nature like this aren’t just destructive—they are often deeply unhappy. It takes a troubled mind to look at a tree and see something to ruin instead of something to protect. Read more here  
    • What a brilliant idea. I hope it went OK, Sue. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...