Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Marmora Son no.2 has just invested his savings and hocked his future summer job earnings to buy a 50cc moped.


Collected at 13.00 today - he parked it on the pavement outside the house at 15.47 - was ticketed (PCN 624) at 15.48 - ?120 fine (?60.00 if we pay up within 14 days).


Offence "having one or more wheels on pavement". In our area it is not unusual to have motor bikes of different sizes parked on the pavement - locked to a tree or lampost. Doesn't disturb the neighbours or frighten the horses.


Having looked it all up - I think he's been "got" bang to rights - but wondered if anyone has a decent defence he could put up, or knows of any arcane piece of traffic law that exempts small (50cc) bikes?? Otherwise his bike has just cost him another ?60.00.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/6622-traffic-warden-ticket-advice/
Share on other sites

I know it must seem arcane to you but if you were visually impaired...or dare I say it, trying to push a single or even double buggy, it is likely that the moped would have caused an obstruction. By all means, fight it if you feel that your case is strong. Good luck.

There is a way round it , i had one for a while...here's how


(A Westminster warden told me this & I did it for years)


Choose your spot in a reasonably safe/clear spot


Park


Cover reg plate well with thick plastic bag and elastic bands


Chuck tax disk under seat in the helmut stowage well out of site


Lock & leave till your hearts content


Traffic wardens ( flies ) are not allowed to tamper with any part of the bike/ no tax no details see.


Bike now becomes "an object" much like a wheelie bin.


Bingo.......



W**F

EDmummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know it must seem arcane to you but if you were

> visually impaired...or dare I say it, trying to

> push a single or even double buggy, it is likely

> that the moped would have caused an obstruction.

> By all means, fight it if you feel that your case

> is strong. Good luck.


Fair point - but the pavement in our road is six feet wide and the bike was up against the wall - no more of an obstruction than the many wheely bins that litter most pavements.


I think he (read Dad) will have to pay up and shut up.

If you appeal the ticket the 14 day discount has to be preserved and if you do not get a reply within 56 days then the penalty becomes invalid, even if you have paid a clamp or towed away charge those must in law be refunded to you.


The only defence I think your son could mount is that the bike had broken down, a ticket can be appealed in these circumstances as it is an exemption.


60% of tickets in London are incorrectly issued and should be appealed apparently.

Got the figure from here...


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/money/consumer_affairs/article1492397.ece


But I guess Mr Segal may have vested interest in promoting the 60% figure.


One of our group company's is a mid sized leasing operation, very few of the reissues to drivers get appealed.


We do appeal all our 'own fleet' tickets, not sure of the success rate.

Tough luck MarmoraMan.

I had no idea there were such parking regulations in your street. Why? It's not adjacent a major row of shops is it. Will he park it in the living room in future or does that sort of behaviour wait till he finds himself a bike-owning girlfriend and moves in with her?

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tough luck MarmoraMan.

> I had no idea there were such parking regulations

> in your street. Why? It's not adjacent a major row

> of shops is it. Will he park it in the living room

> in future or does that sort of behaviour wait till

> he finds himself a bike-owning girlfriend and

> moves in with her?


We've negotiated space beside the bins - but it's not pretty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
    • I used Aria recently to replace the basin waste for my bathroom sink. He was super friendly, communicative and helpful - including changing the washer on the new replacement I bought to ensure longevity. Would highly recommend. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...