Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Despite claims of "austerity", this mad Government is still spending our money like a drunken sailor. How else could some lunatics authorise the expenditure of millions of pounds on resurfacing the entire pavement from Gallery Road to Lordship Lane on the South Circular? Apart from a small section by DC, I doubt that a couple of dozen pedestrians use this in a day. What hope is there of a return to solvency at any time in the next hundred years when our grand children will still be paying for this ongoing binge? The Greatest Fun in all the world, beats everything, seems to be spending other people's money!

I think you'll find it's the council in charge of road surfacing, not central government. Maybe contact your local ward councillor? How do you know it's costing millions of pounds out of interest? And are you talking about every road or just some? Is it entire resurfacing or pothole covering? So many questions.... So many....


Louisa.

Oh, that's nothing in comparison to the ?10,000 being spent by one of our ED concillor's on a feasibility study on Melbourne Grove ED. At least there is a benefit at the end of the works the OP talks of....ah, to get fresh new pavements for your money, now that would be good.

The South Circular is a trunk road and hence maintained by Central Government. The monstrous waste of money outside Alleyn's is the responsibility of Southwark. Lunatics there spend their entire working lives dreaming up daft road improvements to use up their bloated budget at our cost.

Any fool can judge that the renewal of about a mile of South Circular pavements runs into millions. 'Nuff said.

LB of Richmond FoI query response, March 2012: Average costs of relaying / replacing pavement: ?15 / ?23 per square metre. http://www.richmond.gov.uk/home/council_government_and_democracy/data_protection_and_freedom_of_information/freedom_of_information/foi_log/foi_log_search/foi_case_details.htm?id=12786

I suppose a long stretch might make for some economy of scale.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They've left all kinds of things in my garden including gardening gloves and shoes, not to mention scavenged food and packaging. Once they left an unopened vacuum pack of smoked trout, the next day some pita bread. All a bit biblical.
    • From memory foxes only became a regular sight in the 90s, the attached article says they first appeared in the 30s becoming far more common in the 80s.  Apparently, whilst we think that urban foxes live longer than rural due to their 'easy' life few will make it over the age of two.  In towns they are far more crowded than their natural habitat where they are more territorial. I've never seen foxes and cats fighting but once saw two cats squaring up to each other and a watching fox went up and butted its head against one of the cats.  There's a video on youtube of a cat and fox facing off when the cat is eating outside, but it wont let me embed on this post.  Get too close and I'll scratch you. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/15/urban-foxes-are-they-fantastic-or-a-growing-menace My main issue is leaving things out like gardening gloves and they go or are shredded.  One stole a bag of bird food in front of me, took it next door, shredded the bag and then left it.  
    • I was trying to remember when Franklins moved to Lordship Lane from Walworth Road where it was combined with an antique/bric a brac shop. Mid 1990s, first wave ED gentrification?
    • Hello, I lost a babies blanket between Tessa Jowell and the Picture House on Lordship Lane 😞It is teal colour with the name Cillian embroidered on it.  If anyone sees/finds it please let me know.  Thank you! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...