Jump to content

Roadworks in Lordship Lane at end of North Cross Road


Sue

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> first mate Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Still, once it is done pedestrians will have a

> > 'nicer' experience, so has to be worth it.

> >

> > I quote JB from an earlier thread last year

> >

> > " The NXR/LL has a number of pedestrian

> movements

> > but primarily these works are to make this

> > junction more pleasant and a better

> experience."

>

>

> But according to the plan above, all that is being

> done is "resurfacing".

>

> Do you have a link to the other thread you

> mention?



Look at post Southwark nx road plans 11 nov 2014. Shows more than just resurfacing. Cllr Barber responses to all


You might have to dig not too good with it but it's there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dog duck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why not just treat it as a 'pop up' inconvenience?


Yes . Exactly..


It's a minor inconvenience if you need the bus stop..


The crossing is still in place..

BUT Iceland has now gone. I'm sure it will all be fixed by the time M&S comes to town.

Otherwise there will be riots.


Foxy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the point is, it's an "inconvenience" which is going on far longer than it should because nobody is bloody working on it.


And it's probably not a "minor" inconvenience if you have a disability which means it takes you much longer than most people to walk to another bus stop.


GRRRRRRRRR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The junction works involve concrete which has to

> be left to set properly or it will have a shorter

> life span.




Ah OK, fair enough then, (nearly) all is forgiven :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to note that the workmen are out there today installing kerbs.


I was so happy to see this that I chatted to the guys and asked what the hold-up was and they said that they had to wait for the granite kerbs to arrive from China.


The kerbs should be done by Monday and then they'll install the pavement, so hopefully it will all be done by the end of next week, fingers crossed.


The granite deliver delay isn't a wind-up, this has happened before (the Melbourne/EDG raised junction for example)... Southwark orders in bulk to save money (not just from China, there have been delays from Ireland as well), but works get delayed when supply runs out of the specified units.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess they might have let the concrete underlay set while they waited for the granite to arrive... we'll see how long it takes from this point, but it sounds pretty straightforward now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Pleased to report that they are charging through the road works at the moment at least 3 stones completed a day................


Really can they go any slower ?


There are no more then 4 workmen on site at one time and by the looks of it 2 have to be talking and eating or sitting ?


WTF how slow when is the completion date 2018 ? Totally acceptable for a main road to take this long,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The length of time being taken is quite

> astonishing. Pease accept my apologies that the

> contractors FMConways are being allowed to do

> these works so very slowly by Southwark Council.

it will be great when finished but.


But what exactly is it ??


DulwichFox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Making the pavement almost twice as wide and the

> road twice as narrow ??????

> Bob S



Will reduce the cost of a barrier if Cllr B thinks it might be a good idea if someone considers it a good idea to boost property valves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bob Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Making the pavement almost twice as wide and the

> road twice as narrow ??????

> Bob S


Hang on, lads; I've got a great idea.

Let's pedestrianize Lordship Lane, back track on the Melbourne Grove scheme and send all the Buses through there.



DulwichFox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I tell you what, I've answered every question you've posed to me on this thread so far, so before you deflect any further, why don't you address the simple questions I've put to you several times first. Here, give them a go: Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Do you genuinely believe that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the square due to inadequate signage?  
    • Which original consultation?    Err be careful with the expert opinion and data part.....if you think the cycle lobby and Aldred et al is the sole source of sound opinion on such issues! 😉 And this is where they fell foul of the law and had to re-run the consultation. It actually casts huge doubt on a lot of previous consultations (including the latest DV one) as they do not pass the legal watermark because they do not provide a yes/no response. The council are terrified of a judicial review because, I suspect under legal advice, they know they cheated the system in many previous consultations. Do you remember when the council claimed they had a mandate for the CPZs because of some seriously dodgy research conducted with a large tranche of students in the north of the borough in 2018.....
    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void. The criteria for LTNs was high population density, high public transport usage and low car ownership so Dulwich Village was a perfect candidate…not. Just a coincidence but I believe some councillors live within the scheme 
    • We’re looking to buy a house in ED (3 Bed, 1,100 sq ft type). Quite a few we’ve found on Landells Road, Pellatt Road and Jennings Road are half houses. Does anyone have a view or any experiences of living/buying a half house?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...