Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is a message to the lovely East Dulwich female resident who when the Waitrose driver went back to her house to collect some of my items he had accidentally left with her my shopping refused to hand them back. I very much hope you enjoy the dog food, wine and other items and that my croissants are not too dry in your throat.

It's Waitrose issue - they can sue and ban the lady I'd think (and would do so).


I wouldn't even want to know the story - Waitrose - Where is my food ?


Did they give a coupon as well as the refund ??


Edit: To be honest I wouldn't like it if they gave me someone else's stuff either

but I'd obviously return it - I would want to check everything with the receipt then

however.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure how they could Sue, it's their error.



That's not the point. She has kept stuff that isn't hers and that she hasn't paid for.


If you gave me a thousand pounds by mistake and I kept it, that would be OK then because it was your error?


No difference in principle.


But of course Waitrose should well compensate the OP who has been left without part of her shopping.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ruffers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not sure how they could Sue, it's their error.

>

>

> That's not the point. She has kept stuff that

> isn't hers and that she hasn't paid for.



Yep, it's a bit like when a bank accidentally credits someone's account, unfortunately you can't keep it... :)

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> YOu believe the driver did that? really?



I recently had a driver try and deliver a load of groceries to me which were for another house completely.


He wouldn't have realised if I hadn't told him I hadn't ordered any groceries!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The Sky article says the manager has apologised. Apparently, according to the article the person who said they'd apply on Rachel and her husband behalf left and didn't hand the job on. Here's the article https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-reeves-rent-mistake-labour-starmer-asylum-budget-tax-farage-reform-12593360?postid=10440668#liveblog-body
    • Or another thing journalists could do if they wanted to is unearth how many reform or Tory MPs are landlords with similar or worse errors   
    • I'm utterly baffled as to why anybody thinks this is newsworthy, let alone worth a front page. The economy has barely grown for 20 years and the housing crisis has been worsening for a similar time period. Note to any journalists on the forum: maybe focus your headlines on important issues.
    • Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...