Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is a message to the lovely East Dulwich female resident who when the Waitrose driver went back to her house to collect some of my items he had accidentally left with her my shopping refused to hand them back. I very much hope you enjoy the dog food, wine and other items and that my croissants are not too dry in your throat.

It's Waitrose issue - they can sue and ban the lady I'd think (and would do so).


I wouldn't even want to know the story - Waitrose - Where is my food ?


Did they give a coupon as well as the refund ??


Edit: To be honest I wouldn't like it if they gave me someone else's stuff either

but I'd obviously return it - I would want to check everything with the receipt then

however.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure how they could Sue, it's their error.



That's not the point. She has kept stuff that isn't hers and that she hasn't paid for.


If you gave me a thousand pounds by mistake and I kept it, that would be OK then because it was your error?


No difference in principle.


But of course Waitrose should well compensate the OP who has been left without part of her shopping.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ruffers Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not sure how they could Sue, it's their error.

>

>

> That's not the point. She has kept stuff that

> isn't hers and that she hasn't paid for.



Yep, it's a bit like when a bank accidentally credits someone's account, unfortunately you can't keep it... :)

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> YOu believe the driver did that? really?



I recently had a driver try and deliver a load of groceries to me which were for another house completely.


He wouldn't have realised if I hadn't told him I hadn't ordered any groceries!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They used to have dedicated park wardens, who I'm sure used to look after the parks and locked and opened the gates. Years ago I knew someone who was one. I thought they were based in that hut by the toilets. Are they not there any more? The community wardens are attached to the police rather than a specific park, aren't they?
    • Yes, sad how Rye Lane has taken a dive, interesting to see those pics CPR Dave. It's shocking how the section between Choumert Road and the Nag's Head in particular has lost its vibrancy, meanwhile the next section to the top of Peckham Rye Common has gentrified. Wonder why such a distinction in fortunes? Anyway the station square plans have fallen behind yet again, demolition won't now start this summer. The only "work" that will now take place this summer is surveying of the arcade, which they've had 10 years since planning permission to do. At least the replacement TSB branch has progressed but the Blenheim Grove corner building still looks unfinished, despite claims it "is now complete". https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/current-and-future-development/peckham-and-nunhead-2
    • DKH was two form entry, it is now one form entry to cope with the fact it was far more under subscribed than other schools in the area. They had actually combined year groups into single classes, 3/4 and 5/6.  When a school changes name, it’s usually because of a bad reputation perhaps the results.  The new name is dry with no history unlike its current name. It’s a very sketchy decision. It’s an expensive vanity project for someone.  What  will happen if the name change does not increase applications to the school?     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...