Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anyone noticed the new posters put up by the Mayor's office promoting cycling? In none of them is a cyclist wearing a helmet. In fact in one of them a cyclist is riding through a park, which I'm sure is not allowed. Maybe Boris is keeping it real, in which case why doesn't he show them mounting the pavement, jumping red lights and recklessly weaving in and out of traffic ?

"riding through a park, which I'm sure is not allowed"


Says who? Your Mum?


Seriously though, can't someone just start a thread with the title "Cyclists - we hate them" (and another one entitled "Children - anooying little f*ckers aren't they?") which can then roll on endlessly and be ignored by the more enlightened amongst us?

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has anyone noticed the new posters put up by the

> Mayor's office promoting cycling? In none of them

> is a cyclist wearing a helmet. In fact in one of

> them a cyclist is riding through a park, which I'm

> sure is not allowed. Maybe Boris is keeping it

> real, in which case why doesn't he show them

> mounting the pavement, jumping red lights and

> recklessly weaving in and out of traffic ?



----------------------------------------------------------



Jimmy, do your home work! It's boring otherwise, many parks allow & encourage cycling.


Ting - a- ling


Post me your picture so next time i see you and I am on my BIKE I can "carve you up" somewhat.



Must dash....traffic to dodge...lights to jump...OOOOHH JOY

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As long as you post me you're picture first Woof

> so I can run you over just before you carve me

> up.

>

> Ding-dong?


------------------------------------------------


I was slightly disturbed when reading this


until I got to the faintly arousing sign off "Ding-dong"



Jimmy in my mental picture is a cross between a Tattooed Glaswegian brickie & Terry Thomas ......




"Heellooo"



W**F



*I'm easy to spot, large dog riding a bike......Nuueruh*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The Sky article says the manager has apologised. Apparently, according to the article the person who said they'd apply on Rachel and her husband behalf left and didn't hand the job on. Here's the article https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-reeves-rent-mistake-labour-starmer-asylum-budget-tax-farage-reform-12593360?postid=10440668#liveblog-body
    • Or another thing journalists could do if they wanted to is unearth how many reform or Tory MPs are landlords with similar or worse errors   
    • I'm utterly baffled as to why anybody thinks this is newsworthy, let alone worth a front page. The economy has barely grown for 20 years and the housing crisis has been worsening for a similar time period. Note to any journalists on the forum: maybe focus your headlines on important issues.
    • Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...