Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Domitianus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KalamityKel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > parsnip-io Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > KalamityKel Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Ive always found it quite boring, about

> other

> > > > parts of the borough and out of date

> > >

> > >

> > > What's wrong with finding out about other

> parts

> > of

> > > the borough? There's a whole life universe

> > > outside of the warm, fuzzy ED bubble you

> > know...

> >

> > May I suggest you dont stereotype EDF users to

> > only be interested in East Dulwich and East

> > Dulwich only. I just don't happen to find

> reading

> > continuously of news and events on the further

> > side of the borough particularly interesting.

> > Give us news of Peckham, Elephant etc rather

> than

> > Surrey Quays and the likes too tis all I'm

> saying.

>

> 'Tis true




It is the 'Southwark 'news so obviously includes all areas in the Borough whether they interest you or not!

louisiana Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just because you are poor/live in a crap part of

> town/on a crap housing estate, doesn't mean that

> what you deserve is a bundle of badly put-together

> council propaganda. I really do object to this

> approach. It's patronising and condescending.



If it was any better people would moan about their money being squandered on higher production values - when there's bobbies on the beat to pay for or something.


Being a council is a constant catch-22 - you're going to piss off a proportion of people most of the time.

reetpetite Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Domitianus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > KalamityKel Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > parsnip-io Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > KalamityKel Wrote:

> > > >

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > >

> > > > -----

> > > > > Ive always found it quite boring, about

> > other

> > > > > parts of the borough and out of date

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > What's wrong with finding out about other

> > parts

> > > of

> > > > the borough? There's a whole life universe

> > > > outside of the warm, fuzzy ED bubble you

> > > know...

> > >

> > > May I suggest you dont stereotype EDF users

> to

> > > only be interested in East Dulwich and East

> > > Dulwich only. I just don't happen to find

> > reading

> > > continuously of news and events on the

> further

> > > side of the borough particularly interesting.

>

> > > Give us news of Peckham, Elephant etc rather

> > than

> > > Surrey Quays and the likes too tis all I'm

> > saying.

> >

> > 'Tis true

>

>

>

> It is the 'Southwark 'news so obviously includes

> all areas in the Borough whether they interest you

> or not!


Please take the time to RE-READ my comments ta before throwing silly things like that around - I stress, I would like to see OTHER places covered other than the usual places

>

> It is the 'Southwark 'news so obviously includes

> all areas in the Borough whether they interest you

> or not!


Woah, woah, woah... hold your horses there. A slight distinction is needed here. It is not the 'Southwark' News as in the independant 'Southwark News' that is printed weekly and costs 40p in the newsagent. This is a fantabulous publication full of interesting news, views and interviews as well as valuable information and rather interesting adverts across the borough... (excuse the blatantly obvious plug)


While the Southwark Life is the council publication that drops through the letterbox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...