Jump to content

Planning permission for an outrigger loft extension


klove

Recommended Posts

We're getting a loft extension and are end of terrace, so are only allowed 40 cubic metres leaving us with a pretty small room up there. Has anyone gone through full planning with Southwark to get an outrigger built? I get the impression it could be difficult but live in hope. Anyone got any experiences (positive or negative)?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had an outrigger built in addition to the main loft room and ensuite under permitted development. 40 cubic meters will gave us an outrigger bedroom that was 110sft (so a decent double). We limited the height to 2.2 meters in both the main loft and the outrigger and that made it work. If you want really high ceilings in the dormer loft extension or have a really wide main house then it might be more difficult but its worth playing around with the parameters. Do you have an architect?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Londonmix, we're hip to gable so 15 cubic metres are taken up with just sorting out the roof. Otherwise we'd be laughing as our outrigger is measuring 16 cubic metres.


Anyone else had any experiences?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, that's too bad. One trick might be to put in two applications. From what my architect said, Southwark don't always approve / like outrigger extensions and so it's easier to get it via permitted development. Therefore, you could apply for the outrigger via permitted and the dormer / hip to gable via full planning. It would be hard for them to reject the hip to gable as it's got lots of precedent. Just don't take the piss with the size of everything and make sure you aren't harming your neighbours amenity. I've found Southwark to be reasonable.


We submitted 2 applications: pd for the loft, full planning for ground and first floor extension. All went through smoothly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Similar experience to LM. We are nearing the end of a loft and outrigger extension under pd - I'm afraid we were a straightforward dormer for the main room (not hip to gable). Worth getting a few local architects in to take a look around and advise you on the options. I think Southwark are slowly having to come to terms with outriggers as that's a pretty much obvious use of the 40 sqm for terraces.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...