Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

I'm looking for an advice. I'm currently with Virgin media M size package ?50 (broadband, TV, phone). We don't use landline at all, watch TV on the catch up basis and Netflix etc. I would like to switch to Internet and Apple TV and possibly pay for the few apps to be entertained. We have smart TV with free view, so I guess there is a choice of channels to watch.

I've just started searching this subject and it's quite confusing.

Could you possibly please advise on the following:

1. What is the best Internet provider option in the area considering we don't have BT phone line. Our house is wired by some ancient company which BT does not recognise. I would like to avoid ?150 installation cost.

2. If you are already done it, can you recommend some PVRs, please? It does not have to be Apple TV It's appealing as it's cheap and it's got now TV.

Thank you in advance for all tips.

Best wishes!

Hey!


I have a projector and a chromecast. It is amazing. Haven't used a TV or a phone for years.


For broadband I use BT fiber - so unfortunately I do have a landline that I have to pay for but never use. The only reason for this is that virgin doesn't do broadband i my street. I used to have a setup with virgin about 2 years ago where i only paid for broadband - no TV, phone nothing - just the data.

I understand Virgin is the only company that will do you broadband without a landline. Mainly as all the rest use the copper that you'll only have if you have a BT line.


And though I didn't ever actually buy one, when I looked into PVRs last year I came to the conclusion that the best PVRs are made by Humax.

Thank you Fizzmoll,

Would you mind if I ask what is an approximate monthly cost with BT Internet. I was quoted ?35 for Internet only with 100Mb as an existing 8 years service customer, I was considering switching contact to my partner and gaining a benefits of being a new customer again. I know cheeky, but it's big savings long run. Thanks.

Thanks Loz,

I used to work for Loewe in the past. Beautiful TVs but still ongoing many changes. Our product specialists were recommending humax and roku, but still can't see much difference in all of them. Thanks for insight. I will keep researching.

Hey apod,


On the virgin web site, they advertise a 100 meg broadband only offer for 33.50 per month - http://store.virginmedia.com/broadband/compare-broadband/100mb.html


With BT, I think I pay ~45 pounds a month. The BT service is rock solid (fiber all the way into the house) but I think I would probably still go with Virgin if I could. They are cheaper but perhaps more importantly feel more modern in their business strategy than BT. imho.


good luck with finding a good deal!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So you are justifying building on the green belt, in Londons case "the lungs of London" which will causes harm to natures ability to turn co2 into o2? 
    • But at the same time those she sought for advice told her, very clearly, she needed to seek specialist advice which she did not do and carried on regardless. So I think the jury is out on whether this was a legitimate mistake or not.
    • Thanks @Sephiroth I was thinking along the same lines (demonisation of Rayner by the media) and came across this article yesterday from Manchester Evening News.  It doesn't excuse her, but the title "Angela Rayner's real offence was being a working class woman in power" is self explanatory. https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/angela-rayners-real-offence-being-32422596 The crossing legs nonsense is particularly telling.
    • Given her role, she pretty much had to go. I don't think she is an avid tax-schemer who deliberately set out to avoid tax - I do pretty much believe her story of multiple high-profile roles and looking after a child with needs. But many regular voters juggle demanding jobs and families and are afforded no leeway by taxman, so she totally should have known better But here we are - she was found to be negligent and now she has suffered teh consequence. To me that its the OPPOSITE of all parties/politicians as generally the ignore the whole thing (today we have Tice saying Farage's tax affairs are of no interest to voters for example) And it would be poor form to not acknowledge why she was targeted quite so viciously - we even have posters on here here saying "when I saw her taping on a boat that was the  end for me" - like the end of what?. Her gender and class were clear motivators for many people. Two wrongs don't make a right - but it';s interesting to see some posters on here give so many others a blank cheque. Many are planning to vote for Farage despite his dishonesty being 100x worse than Rayner PS - I don't think she will join Corbyn party - unlike him she is smart and unlike him she recognises that being In power means you can at least stand a chance of delivering results This. The Greens will have a rise in the polls on back of new leader but that is one hell of a coalition of NIMBY/YIMBYs As what would Reform do if in government to help with... well, anything?   Labour can at least point to decreasing waiting lists, lower immigration numbers, not having a different PM every 6 months - not that anyone is listening
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...