Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apparently there have been lots of new allegations since this news was published - I know that it is generally accepted that weight of evidence by multiple allegations means you do not need more different evidence - but I'm still not 100% sure about that.


Operation Midland (I think) was said (on TV yesterday) to be investigating over 100 "household names" Edit: there actually seems to be loads of them so probably a mistake.


http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/04/police-child-abuse-inquiries-operation-yewtree-to-operation-midland

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69471-edward-heath/#findComment-883737
Share on other sites

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why didn't the police reveal this 40 years ago?

> Another government cover-up that's why.


'Government cover-up' makes it sound like a big, organised conspiracy, whereas I bet the reality was a few in the know who simply turned a blind eye to it all, a la Saville.

Anyways, I thought there were plenty of rumours in the public domain about Heath while he was still alive...Morning Cloud...Roger the Cabin Boy...say no more, say no more...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69471-edward-heath/#findComment-883779
Share on other sites

Government cover-up assumes that Ted Heath is guilty, which I think is far from proven.


Just seen this article in the Telegraph about it, which I think I broadly agree with: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11784844/The-Edward-Heath-witch-hunt-is-the-stuff-of-Hitlers-dreams.html

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69471-edward-heath/#findComment-883842
Share on other sites

I wouldn't speculate as to who is guilty and who isn't but whether there has been cover ups around Westminster is under little doubt....it would be naive to think that Westminster is not able to shift things under the rug.


I have been watching these events unfold for some weeks on the internet. The reason I have used the internet to read up about it was because very little has been put out by the media.


An Australian current affairs programme recently aired a 60 min reporting/ exposing the scandal. In the UK, however, the media was bizarrely quiet considering the potential enormity of the situation.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRObgttIyeg


Up until now, when Edward Heath accusations have suddenly made big news.


I personally don't find it confusing that it is only people who are already deceased who are making it into the press...... if the sh*t could potentially hit the fan then best to try and confine the damage to people who are already gone?


Judge Lowell Goddard (from New Zealand) has reportedly been commisioned to investigate Westminster because she "has no links to British Establishment"

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69471-edward-heath/#findComment-883950
Share on other sites

Victims were not listened to at the time and there was lots of cover-ups, whether celebrities, politicians ... if they are alive, prosecute them, if they are dead, name and shame them.


When children are abused and neglected either by strangers or family, they are damaged for life. In many circumstances they are too frightened to say anything to anyone, they are often beaten and told they are worthless, no-one cares, no one will believe them and they'll end up in a home (if not in one already) .. and they are explained away as trouble makers and problem kids. They only problems they have are made by abusers. In adult life, they can be promiscuous, not maintain relationships, be unable to commit, trust people, or have their own children etc.

Many suffer life long depression, many commit suicide.


Many years later, it only takes one other victim to come forward, the victim may feel justified in coming forward because it is not just them on their own, just their word against someone they have always perceived as untouchable. Its CLOSURE for these victims and they need it to move on and know that it was NEVER THEIR FAULT, they have been let down by society. Thank you.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69471-edward-heath/#findComment-883968
Share on other sites

We just can't know for suree. I think there was clear evidence in the case of Saville (too many connections/ sightings/claims etc) but policing was very different at the time of these allegations, and I think the Justice system too. It was harder for victims of abuse and rape to speak out and if they did, the process of even getting to court was much harder. When Ester Rantzen carried out her confidential survey into sexual abuse, the response was so overwhelming that it led to Childline and a change in the way Police handle rape victims. It's perfectly easy to understand why rape and abuse victims didn't come forward at the time. Peodophiles are particulary adept (and especially in that climate) of making victims too afraid or too ashamed to speak out.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69471-edward-heath/#findComment-884280
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

> surely were talking about 'alleged victims' until

> a case has been substantiated?



The "weight of evidence idea" without anything else is worrying

for me in a world where hundreds of americans claim they are

infected by biting parasitic worms carried by genetically modified

cotton in a government conspiracy.


if you keep reading the worm stories you think - even though doctors

claim nothing is there - by the sheer weight of evidence - it's true.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgellons

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/69471-edward-heath/#findComment-884292
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry but I think it's best if people just check things for themselves when they buy things. In three shops/restaurants (from some years back) I just avoid the places concerned, as in all three  cases I was pretty sure it wasn't a genuine mistake, and in one place  it happened more than once and usually late at night.
    • Sorry Sue - me again. This has been on my mind all day, it's a big bug bear of mine. If you don't mind - please can you private message me some of these shops so I can cross reference / add to my AVOID list.  Thanks in advance. Let's make sure this doesn't happen this Christmas, particularly as we head into sales season. Even more problematic in my experience.
    • Pity you didn't quote what you are referring to, Mal. I didn't see the previous post, and my mind is boggling 😮
    • The Cherry Tree was absolutely excellent for a while when a youngish couple ran it and brought in a really good chef. It was them who renamed it The Cherry Tree. They were really turning it around. The chef did fantastic Scotch eggs, and one of the best roasts I've ever had. If memory serves the then owner,  for some reason known only to himself, took a dislike to them and what they were doing and sacked them all. And yes we weren't expecting a top class  meal last Christmas, and we left it too late to book anywhere else, but we weren't expecting it for a hundred pounds EACH to be quite as terrible as it was. Stupid us. Not sure why you are confused by my post, Jazzer? Did I misremember? Now it's got even more confusing because my posts have been merged and your confused emoji is shown at the bottom of the second one instead of the first 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...