Jump to content

20 Volunteers needed for free 4 week diet trial starting October


NutRed

Recommended Posts

I am still looking for 20 volunteers to attend a free 4-week trial to lose weight and improve energy. You will be following a low GL weight loss program and will receive motivational health coaching. The results will be measured against other weight loss methods and used as part of a national study on weight loss, energy improvement and motivation.


In order to qualify for this trial you will need to:


Have a minimum of 10lbs (5kg) excess weight to lose

Have an interest in improving nutrition to benefit health

Have experienced significantly reduced energy levels for at least a year

Have tried several diets before and re-gained some or all of the weight you have lost

Have experienced cravings and/or sometimes felt the need to comfort eating

Be prepared to commit to attending a 4 week program consisting of four 2 hour sessions, mornings or evenings

Provide feedback and give your permission for the results to be published anonymously as part of a national research project on weight loss and motivation

This diet trial is starting end of September in London SE22 and SE23 area. To apply for a place or to attend a free seminar please contact Sun?

http://nutritionredefined.co.uk/group-coaching/

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...