Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The laptop squatters appear to have moved from Caffe Nero, following recent criticism on the East Dulwich Forum, and have now started to invade the nearby and excellent Brick House Bakery. These squatters are a pest and becoming as invasive as Japanese knotweed.


We do not want them - especially a particularly annoying example of the species today who occupied a table for 4 people - with his single cup of coffee - and was wearing headphones so that he could engage loudly in boring telephone conversations about his stupid little 'business' problems - oblivious to how irritating his behaviour was to other customers.


The Brick House is a great place where friends can chat, eat and drink - or individual can enjoy a break, browsing newspapers and magazines. It is not for selfish laptop squatter nerds, so please GO AWAY! You are not wanted.

Are you sure the Brick House don't want these customers? Surely it's up to them. There are ways they could dissuade laptops if they wanted to... e.g. limit wifi to 30 mins per person, not provide power points, etc.


I think a better tactic would be to speak with the manager(s) and let them decide if they want to take action or not.

My beef is with parents who bring their offspring into coffee shops, who then run riot when you are trying to have a quiet coffee; laptop squatters can always be convinced to share their tables, even with a few harrumphs. Some parents have a complete meltdown when you ask them to control their offspring.

Agree with the latter post and the OP.

I went to Brickhouse for lunch yesterday-brought a loaf of bread and ordered a salad and a coffee to have in-a total outlay of over a tenner-it was hard to find anywhere to sit-one long table was full of mums and buggies, the other laptop squatters, the smaller tables also had people on laptops-I shared one of these tables.

The person sharing it with me had an empty cup when I arrived, and was still there when I left, ditto all the folks at the long shared tables, I recall seeing only one of these people eating a sandwhich.

Cafes should put a minimum spend/maximum stay limit up for busy times, I think thats fair.

Change the record, please. I'm getting bored of listening to 'Laptop Squatters' by the Moaning Witch Brigade.


These "sqautters" - whoe'er they be - have just as much right as you to be there as you. Only they got there before you, didn't they, and you're a bit annoyed at that, aren't you? And (heaven forefend!) they're using a table designed for four people? Did you ever think that maybe when they came in it was the only free table? No. Or how about going over and asking them if they'd mind sharing or moving? No... that, apparently, misses the point?!


Moan, moan, moan, I've got nothing better to do with my time than complain about the most trifling of matters. Blah, blah laptops, blah, blah prams. Now if you'll excuse me I'm off to squat in someone else's buggie on all the tables in Foxtons.

dulwich2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't understand why they don't just use their

> own wifi at home? I've never thought to take

> laptop out to a coffe shop. why? Surely

> everything has Internet at home now days?


Exactly...


And your home Wi-Fi is going to be FAR more secure than any Pub/Caf? internet connection..


Scammers and ID thieves love these places.. The person on the next to you may well be sharing more than

just a table with you.. Your email can easily be compromised without you knowing and your credit card details

can be accessed.


And this can be done with simple kit and cheap available software..


DulwichFox

dulwich2020 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't understand why they don't just use their

> own wifi at home? I've never thought to take

> laptop out to a coffe shop. why? Surely

> everything has Internet at home now days?



But equally you could say why don't people stay at home and make their own coffee.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dulwich2020 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I don't understand why they don't just use

> their

> > own wifi at home? I've never thought to take

> > laptop out to a coffe shop. why? Surely

> > everything has Internet at home now days?

>

>

> But equally you could say why don't people stay at

> home and make their own coffee.


I do both.. I'm sitting at home working on my laptop, TV / Music on in the background.

No buggies.. Kids running around.. If I want a coffee / tea biscuit, I pop to the kitchen put on the kettle

and I'm all done in 5 minutes..


Why lug Laptops and power leads down the caf?. ?? I think a lot of it is the desire to be seen.

Well the days of the young upwardly- mobile professional are long passed. Went out with the Filofax.

Some people need a whisper in their ear..


DulwichFox

If someone is working from home they might well welcome an occasional break from staring at their own four walls, whilst still needing to carry on working.


However I do think it is selfish to hog a table for hours with one cup of coffee when others are needing a place to sit.


But some people have always done that, except it might be with a book or whatever and not a laptop.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If someone is working from home they might well

> welcome an occasional break from staring at their

> own four walls, whilst still needing to carry on

> working.

>

> However I do think it is selfish to hog a table

> for hours with one cup of coffee when others are

> needing a place to sit.

>

> But some people have always done that, except it

> might be with a book or whatever and not a laptop.


Most people usually Choose to work from home for the very reasons I have stated..


If you are running a business from an insecure network then you asking for trouble..

Likewise online banking and other business related internet access.


Dangers of insecure networks


To understand that we first have to understand what a hacker normally does when he infects your computer with a virus. Infected computers allow hackers to do lots of no-good things such as:


Use your computer to send SPAM.

SPAM is generally sent from the computers of unsuspecting people who?ve been infected with a virus.


Perform a Denial of Service attack.


Key Logging. This is an attack where a virus watches everything that you type on your keyboard and relays it to a hacker somewhere remotely. Not so interesting if you?re writing an email to your mom, but VERY interesting if you?re entering account information into your bank?s site or typing in your credit card numbers to but something online.

Privacy issues and identity theft. Once a hacker can control your computer, he can see pretty much everything.


An infected computer is dangerous to use. However, when hackers attack routers and networks, every computer in the home becomes dangerous. This is because these attacks:

Allow hackers to take control of your DNS system.


Direct your computer to places which will infect it with viruses.

Take you to sites that only look like the ones you want to use. They?re really sites controlled by the hacker where he can serve you any information that he wants.


Source:- http://www.routercheck.com/dangers-of-insecure-networks/


Many people just aren't aware of the dangers or think their anti-virus will protect them..

The Hackers will take control of your device and disable your anti-virus.


DulwichFox

standswithfist Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Oh so now parents can't take their kids into

> coffee shops either? GIVE US A BREAK!!! Its really

> getting boring!



No, just, you know, control them a bit? Ask them to stop shouting ? Ask them not to run around and then cry when they fall over/bang their head on a table/spill a load of milk all over them/because they're overtired and you're ignoring them ?


Just my half penny's worth...

I'm really sorry guys - but can't we all just get along? I am assuming that the OP was some kind of tongue in cheek joke.


I work from home running my own business was, and although I usually don't as I have a big screen I use for lots of my work, there might be times when I think 'do you know what, these four walls are driving me mad, let's get out into the realm of real people and have something to eat or drink while I'm at it'. Maybe they have housemates and need some space, maybe they are having building work done. It's not all posturing.


If people are taking up space, ask to share. I imagine home workers are an important element of the weekday economy for businesses.


As for the risk of being hacked the second you leave your home. I think that's somewhat overstated, and who knows what people are doing.


Basically we all need to get along in this great city of ours, regardless of how irritating you might find certain people.

Bluelagoon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm really sorry guys - but can't we all just get

> along? I am assuming that the OP was some kind of

> tongue in cheek joke.

>

> I work from home running my own business was, and

> although I usually don't as I have a big screen I

> use for lots of my work, there might be times when

> I think 'do you know what, these four walls are

> driving me mad, let's get out into the realm of

> real people and have something to eat or drink

> while I'm at it'. Maybe they have housemates and

> need some space, maybe they are having building

> work done. It's not all posturing.

>

> If people are taking up space, ask to share. I

> imagine home workers are an important element of

> the weekday economy for businesses.

>

> As for the risk of being hacked the second you

> leave your home. I think that's somewhat

> overstated, and who knows what people are doing.

>

> Basically we all need to get along in this great

> city of ours, regardless of how irritating you

> might find certain people.


Yes


But if we share tables are we meant to sit in silence

or share some anecdotes :)

Baggs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The best thing to do with this kind of infestation

> is to cut the tops off and fill them with a

> concentrated glyphosate solution (if they are

> thick enough). Then spray the ones which are too

> small to fill/inject.



I think you're on the wrong thread :))


Unless you're suggesting murdering the laptop squatters with Roundup :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
    • Having just been to Co-op to redeem a 50p off Co-op members' card voucher on an item that is now 50p more than it was last week, Tesco can't come soon enough
    • Surely that depends on the amount.  It can be quite piffling.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...