Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was overrun.. I tried to change the system... but the system changed me ;-)


Anyway, happyman, you'll be pleased to know that a whole bunch of us will be coming to the new restaurant next week as part of the curry club - usually between 8 and 15 people turn up but anyone is welcome to come along and join in


(Kel, point taken, but it's still relatively "new" to some people. Like, say... the manager)

happyman, research is good but not declaring an interest is considered very bad form.


For example, had someone posted a negative review you may have challenged it. However, it makes a significant difference to how your response is interpreted if readers know you're the manager.


Your opinion would hold slightly more weight if readers considered it independent. Traders know this, and try to post under anonymity to get extra influence for free.


This would be quite simply trying to gain an advantage through deception. Because readers don't like to be conned, it would have a very negative effect on your business.


However, it doesn't apply in this case, because you've swiftly moved to dispel any confusion.


Well done!

Happyman - do you have the same chef???


The Coriander did the best curry on Lordship Lane, so hopefully that won't change. We were regulars.


Sunday buffet was nice and hot (some other Lordship Lane curry houses have only *lukewarm* buffets because they insist to having it next to the front door so it goes cold quickly). Sunday buffet also had fab starters, prepared fresh - yum.


Service was a bit slow sometimes even when Coriander wasn't busy, so hopefully the new place will be better. Look forward to trying it out.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Domitianus Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > I will NOT be going on account of a matter of

> > personal principle.



>

>Ladymuck wrote:

> Oh DO tell all!;-)



Still busting to know...;-)

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > > Domitianus Wrote:

> > > > I will NOT be going on account of a matter

> of

> > > > personal principle.

> > >

> > >

> Ladymuck wrote:

> Oh DO tell all!;-)

> >

> Domitianus wrote:

> > Hey, it's personal.

>

>

>

>

> Fair enough.



Okay, I'll let you into the secret. I have a moral objection to the sale of foodstuffs from public premises.

Domitianus Wrote:

> > > > > I will NOT be going on account of a matter

> > of personal principle.

> > > >

> > > >

> > Ladymuck wrote:

> > Oh DO tell all!;-)

> > >

> > Domitianus wrote:

> > > Hey, it's personal.

> >

> >Ladymuck wrote:

> > Fair enough.

>

Domitianus wrote:

> Okay, I'll let you into the secret. I have a

> moral objection to the sale of foodstuffs from

> public premises.



I repeat: fair enough.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am struggling to understand how Green policies translate to local issues? The Southwark Greens leaflet I received reads like a general wish list but is not locally specific. I know the same can be said of other political parties. What specifically are Greens plans for housing, protecting local parks, council tax, transport and roads/ pavement upkeep, CPZ/LTNs?
    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...