Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was surprised they were so different. What do the Top 10s say about their services and users?


Soundcloud?s 10 most played artists of the year


1. Drake

2. Major Lazer

3. G-Eazy

4. Future

5. Kygo

6. PARTYNEXTDOOR

7. Chris Brown

8. Kid Ink

9. The Weeknd

10. Chance The Rapper


Spotify?s most-streamed artists


1. Calvin Harris

2. Chris Brown

3. Drake

4. Ed Sheeran

5. Pitbull

6. Sam Smith

7. David Guetta

8. Wiz Khalifa

9. Nicki Minaj

10. Ellie Goulding


YouTube?s most popular official pages


1. Maroon 5

2. Katy Perry

3. Rihanna

4. Nicky Jam

5. Ariana Grande

6. Ed Sheeran

7. Enrique Iglesias

8. Beyonc?

9. David Guetta

10. Meghan Trainor


Read more at http://m.inthemix.com.au/news/61129/Soundcloud_names_its_10_most_played_artists_of_2015#mBlIoqZ55Ulam4Sf.99

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/72091-music-services-top-10/
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was wondering what that said about Soundcloud

> and its direction/user group as compared to Spotify for example



Otta Wrote: probably because soundcloud has a lot of independent artists.


This. Soundcloud is conventionally a service for those at the "grassroots" level of music, whereas Spotify is more geared towards the relatively mainstream.

http://www.factmag.com/2015/08/27/prs-for-music-takes-legal-action-against-soundcloud/



I don't really understand their point. Surely artists decide to put their music on soundcloud or not, and choose whether or not it's for public consumption, and whether or not people can download it.


So what are PRS suggesting that Soundcloud should be doing differently?

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These people are only "huge" if you listen to

> certain radio stations, certain TV channels/shows,

> etc. To the rest of us they barely exist.


Was directed at the 'soundcloud is for grass roots artists' comment.


Huge in terms of record sales.


Not my cup of tea, but clearly plenty of people's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    • Now who might that be?
    • Harvey and Wheeler in Dulwich Village? Only one I know… How can they offer to apply and never did? Surely; whether they are managing the property or not and with tech been so advanced I would have thought they would have been a couple of e mails sent as a reminder or, is it the Landlord’s responsibility to apply… Rental Law/ Bill has just come  into force  - can’t remember if it was this week or last and have been to busy to read.. However, will as assume it is not individual councils but all councils. Came up on Which on line.. Good point Jen Jen Jen - sure some knowledgable person on here can throw more light than I.
    • Does this mean then that anybody who rents out their home in East Dulwich needs one of these licenses? And does everyone of these landlords have one?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...