Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Following the recent media earthquake concerning politicians fiddling with tax payers money for their own benefit I thought it would be interesting, not to mention relevent, to ask you lot if you've ever claimed for stuff you shouldn't have. I personally haven't ever really had an expenses account but I have hired out machinerey and tools that I don't own to builders and friends over the weekend without the owners consent. I've made a tidy sum carrying out this blatant abuse of my position.


Over to you.



(Moved to the Lounge as it is not a current affair or topic relevant for the Drawing Room - The Administrator)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7267-expenditures/
Share on other sites

VeI've had a couple of nice meals and the odd drinkypoo on expenses but I don't think I've ever abused expenses. I think the company I worked for was insane to fly me out to an office in another country on premium price tickets every week when there were locals perfectly capable of doing the job but that was somebody elses problem.


Plus the taxpayer wasn't paying as that was before that Dutch bank got nationalised by the err...UK government;)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7267-expenditures/#findComment-231332
Share on other sites

I suspect it generally comes down to how easy it is to claim. A (tabloid) journalist friend is effectively given a certain sum per week and just has to collect enough receipts to cover it; it's treated as part of the pay packet, and none is ever given back. In my current job the process is pretty tortuous so often I don't bother claiming for genuine expenses.


What you've been doing is a bit different tho' - and very enterprising (and highly illegal). The construction industry is notorious for fiddles, from top to bottom. I heard of a case where a quarry manager got caught flogging truck loads of gravel for cash in the dead of night, which anecdotally goes on all the time. I mean, how do you do a stocktake in a quarry?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7267-expenditures/#findComment-231336
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why would you have to look for "a good reason to not vote for the greens"? What a very strange thing to say. Would you like to explain your logic?
    • Hi All, Looking for recommendations in the following professions. Ideally based locally. -Psychiatrist -Psychologist  -Therapist (EMDR) -Child Psychiatrist ADHD and ASD exp - ideal Any information would be appriciated. C
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...