Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well should repetition be banned on EDF? Should it be banned on EDF?


If we've already had a thread before, should it be disallowed?

What about threads saying "Recommendation for a builder wanted"? Should that be banned because it has appeared before?


Betcha fiver this get's lounged....

No, it's been moved to the "About The Forum" section, because it's a question about the forum.


Since it was my comments that started this I thought I'd respond, although I'd like to make it absolutely clear I'm not involved in the running of the forum, I'm just a user like anyone else.


All I posted was a friendly and polite suggestion that it might be better to add to existing threads than start new ones to prevent the forum getting repetitive. It wasn't bullying or dictating it was my opinion as a user of the forum and I don't really see what the problem was with me posting it and why it's got you so upset. As for your TV analogy - if you don't like the show change channel - what if every channel is showing a repeat of a sit-com that wasn't that funny the first time around?


I really don't know why this has got you so wound up, or if it's just me that you're not keen on, I wasn't trying to assert any kind of authority over anyone I was just saying what I thought.

I totally sympathise annaj, I've just had to do the same in the lounge, they even had the same blimmin title...on the same page...!!!

But not everyone has worn slippers has worn (in both sense) slippers here for three years, so i have sympathy when people don't realise.

Mind you I can't think of a more pleasant not polite, nor generally all round person I'd like to be told off by than you.


Except maybe citizen....or quids, if he had a gin & tonic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.      
    • "PGC, do you reckon this 'Anderson -Tendulkar' series could make Tests a bit more interesting to the wider word?" Alas no. Until it comes back to terrestial telly, I think it will always suffer from elitism(?).  Excepting The Guardian, cricket is barely mentioned in other press. I am fortunate in that my daughter has just added me to her subscription on NOW TV. It has been great to watch this test; it really could have gone either way, eariler in the day, which always makes it more exciting. The only bugbear is that I am a TMS afficianado, and they are about eight deliveries ahead of the tv! I thought Tongue was excellent in mopping up the tailenders, and Duckett was a delight to watch. Bumrah and Jadeja were brilliant to see. I'm sure the Edgbaston crowd will have tremendous supporters for both sides. PS: I don't think Jofra will be back on the strength of one county wicket.
    • Why it a strange first post Sue?  We all have to start somewhere! These kids have created a situation where they have been very unpleasant. Surely their physical appearance etc is a key factor in identifying them?  I don’t understand. Are you defending these kids? 
    • I can do the research but are more people watching cricket on TV now it went to the higher bidder or in 05 when it was on Channel 4?  I think that less kids are into cricket since it went off terrestrial.  I suppose I should have had TMS on.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...