Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A relative was recently prescribed Orlistat and asked me to check it out on the web: I couldn't find anything that merited serious concern.


It's method of action is quite interesting: it's not absorbed into the body but rather stays in the intestinal tract where it binds with the enzyme that usually breaks down fats so they can be absorbed. The result is that fats remain in the gut and are passed out undigested. The main side effects are issues like oily stools, leakage, flatulence, etc.


I didn't realise it was available OTC. I'd be tempted to try it if my diet wasn?t virtually fat free these days.

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

The main side

> effects are issues like oily stools, leakage,

> flatulence, etc.


------------------------------------------------------------


The usual then........which is nice!

I was in the supermarket the other day, talking to my friend on the phone who was telling me all about her weight loss on account of swine flu. No idea what my side of the conversation gave away, but a lovely lady came and tapped me on the shoulder to interrupt the conversation and said that if I was talking about Alli, I should be aware that it makes you shit yourself.

RosieH Wrote:


No idea what my side of the conversation gave away,

> but a lovely lady came and tapped me on the

> shoulder to interrupt the conversation and said

> that if I was talking about Alli, I should be

> aware that it makes you shit yourself.


Ignore her RosieH she's just trying to put the wind up you.

Read an article a while ago by someone who was doing a one month trial. The bit that put me off was when she woke in the middle of the night lying in a puddle of 'an olive oil like substance', and for the rest of the month couldn't go out without a jumper around her waist or a long top as a the 'olive oil substance' continued to leak at inopportune moments. Think I'd rather be a bit fat!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...