Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If you believe that HonaB and bbw are two dimorphous substances then its Number 4:Isodimorphous....


You are right. How the heck you managed to deduce that correctly I'll never know,especially as I'm on a much lower intellectual level than yourgoodself.


This is why I perfectly understand you totally ignoring my genuine question earlier.

Sorry I didn?t even see that. I was too busy trying to get to bbw by slagging off Forest Hill.


I was trying to find a way home after missing the last train from Willesden Jnc. when I ended up completely lost. I was on one of those railway footpaths when a few unsavory looking fellows with a couple of pit bulls approached me. My immediate reactions was that they were after trouble but it turned out they were only interested in whether or not I was in the market for some crack cocaine.


After politely declining their offer one of them said something to me along the lines of, ?You really shouldn?t be wondering around here mate.? and then directed me to the closest cab office.


The educational side of it was, don?t go wondering around lonely areas in London?s murder capital at 2am.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

Sorry I didn?t even see that. mate.?



Thanks Brendan.


Funny thing happened to me 3 years ago in the Peckham Road which is the one b4 you turn left into Commercial Way.


I saw 2 pretty girls on my right-hand side at 2.00AM on a Saturday Night and my car hit the kerb, accordingly and burst my tyre. I drove to the "Jet" garage in The Old Kent Road and waited for The A.A.


Fast forward one year and an identical thing happened at the same kerb at roughly the same time, Saturday Night again!..Same Garage waiting for the A.A. and I was really worried that these 5 young lads were hanging round ( to the extent that I left my car there and walked away). It turns out that they were waiting for The Night Bus and I, sheepishly, returned to my vehicle b4 The A.A. Guy turned up...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...