Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have had a quick scan through the page linked above and notice you assert:


"This application supports unfair burial provision, as none of the burial provision would be accessible to Southwark residents of Orthodox Jewish or Muslim faiths, who also require burial"


Can you advise me where in Southwark's proposals it states this, or how you reach this conclusion?

nxjen, I believe the reference to lack of burial provision for Orthodox Jewish or Muslim residents is because it's desirable in those faiths to have separate burial areas allocated to just those faiths, which isn't part of the current Southwark plans for COC. I find the comment about fairness a bit strange, given the view of at least certain members of the campaign group that no burials should take place on site at all and "the woods are for the living to enjoy" and that "religious burial is an outmoded concept that has no place in a modern society". My personal view is different and I've said so at every consultation opportunity and meeting.

I also believe burials on top of other previous burials is also not allowed by some faiths.


The council plans are to spend multi million pounds - circa ?5m in phase 1 to remove trees etc. Effectively the council will be grossly subsidising every burial there. It could use a commercial cemetery a couple of miles away, reduce the costs to families dramatically, and avoid this huge capital outlay.

Hi James,

Kemnal Park Cemetery is not local, it's address is Sidcup By-Pass, Chislehurst, Kent BR7 6RR, it's not easy to get there via public transport, if you travel there by train it involves cab journeys from the local train stations


the directions given to get there are:

How to find the park

We are situated directly on the A20 Sidcup Bypass heading towards London. (Off the M25 at Junction 3 follow signs for A20 Lewisham/London bound)The Park is approximately 1 mile from Frognal Corner (Queen Mary?s Hospital), just past the Virgin Active gym, the park is clearly signposted and has a private entrance on the A20.


Also, nxjen and Sidhue there is an active Muslim burial area which is situated on what was the site of former plant nurseries in the centre of Nunhead Cemetery. All the Muslims burial plots appear to be aligned with each other, so I'm assuming that they are aligned to Mecca. Correct me if I'm wrong on the following, I believe that Orthodox Jewish burials traditionally are only in Orthodox Jewish burial sites. Unrelated males and females can't be buried in adjacent plots (only family members).


The Peckham Rye Ward Councillors are working with groups to find the best solutions. My most recent meeting with a member of SSW was last Thursday in Camberwell new Cemetery.

Renata

Thanks Renata for clarification regarding Muslim and Jewish burials and also for advising where the mythical cemetery is "a couple of miles away"! I agree Siduhe that this particular argument from S"SW" is at odds with the main thrust of their objections and, again, disingenuous.


As for James' point that "Effectively the council will be grossly subsidising every burial there", when so much is paid for through one tax or another,I really don't have a problem with burials being subsidised.

As burial in the plots is paid for, and is not cheap, the council will get its money back, or at least get back the running costs of keeping the cemetery viable as a cemetery. The bits which are now overgrown are dangerous - with burials unstable and graves opened by tree roots. There are old trees in amongst the new growth certainly, these were almost certainly the trees originally planted in the cemetery (or later, as those parts were still in regular use for burial) - as you can see still in the tended bits now. These are not now nor have they ever been 'Southwark Woods' - this is a complete and fictitious spin, as is much in the tendentious petitions, now being supported by a councilor in whose ward the cemetery does not, I believe, fall.


Burial grounds in London have always been re-used - this is being done in an entirely proper way. Certain groups chose not to have themselves interred with other groups - to say that they have been excluded is again spin, and rather nasty spin at that. If you look round the cemetery you will see a multiplicity of ethnicities and religions there - as you expect in a municipal cemetery, generally reflecting the mix of peoples who live 'locally'. And that is the point of having local cemeteries - so that those who wish to mourn a resting place have one that is convenient for them to visit.


What makes me really angry is that there are, locally to us, vast areas of parkland, genuine woodland etc. etc. - we are absolutely not starved for green areas in this bit of SE London. And yet you would think from the outcries that this was the last green area in an urban wasteland.


I do not want to preserve a dangerous area of un-cared for scrubland - used in the past for fly-tipping (and how much more of that can we expect now that large item collections are to be charged for?) If the council cannot use this for burials (which are income generating) - don't expect them to spend a penny on upkeep (I wouldn't).


It's a cemetery - for burying people - it's not and never has been woodland - (not since the Conquest anyway, and probably before) - the 20-40 years scrubland growth there now reflects a dereliction in duty of proper care by the council, not an opportunity.


Considering the genuine dangers that the area actually presents - if the petitions work then, as a council, I would surround the scrubland element with a 10ft high chain link fence (to keep children and fly-tippers out) and leave it to rot. That would be a reasonable investment. And if further burial is to be banned on all the site, then seal it all off, or sell it for housing development. There is no way I would want the council spending money on what clearly is being thought of as someone's private playground. We have ample parks and green spaces meant for that purpose already.

"Burial grounds in London have always been re-used - this is being done in an entirely proper way"


Sadly not true in this instance. If the burial space had been used in a proper way on these sites, then there would have been no need at all to chop down mature trees in order to make space for further burial. This mis-management is something that the Council have admitted and did so at the meeting they held to outline their plans. That they held this meeting at all was largely thanks to the SSW campaign.


"Southwark Woods" is merely a campaign name to represent both old and new cemeteries. Keep the wooded parts and these will be enjoyed by the living and help mitigate pollution levels.

That Southwark Council have mismanaged the cemetery in the past is no argument that they should not take appropriate, proper action now. No, "Southwark Woods" is not merely a campaign name, it is a rebranding exercise that in a stroke attempts to misleadingly transform a cemetery into a historic area of woodland.

Not so. There are 2 cemeteries involved and there is some historic woodland on One Tree Hill that is under threat.


Appropriate, proper action would be to reuse space that is already managed or to use space in a sustainable way. The council's preferred course is neither of these things.

We are talking below the line of sight in that picture. There are oaks that are clearly well more than 100 years old (2 arm spans of circumference). The woodland that existed on that hill before it was grazed (as in the picture), was part of the Great North wood. Am not sure if the trees are actually part of that or not, but either way it can be viewed as historic.

In fact, I don't believe that there is such a (legal) entity as historic woodland - 'ancient woodland' is a legal concept In the United Kingdom, an ancient woodland is a woodland that has existed continuously since 1600 or before in England, Wales and Northern Ireland (or 1750 in Scotland).[1][2] Before those dates, planting of new woodland was uncommon, so a wood present in 1600 was likely to have developed naturally.[3] The analogous American term is "old-growth forest". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_woodland


All the (internet accessed) sources I can find don't suggest that 'natural' woodland is the equivalent of wild growth within a pre-termined area - such as a bomb site or as here a poorly maintained cemetery. Anything (even the detritus in a student fridge) can be seen as 'historic' - but in general something less than 40 years old normally isn't. Nor would growth (really) in only the last century or so - and One Tree Hill was used as an ack-ack site during the last war, I believe, when surrounding trees (if any) would have been felled to give clear lines of fire.


Edited to add - one must not confuse the existence of some old trees within a landscape as necessarily meaning that the landscape is wooded, in any real sense of the word. Trees often marked field etc. boundaries - or were planted as decorations in e.g. cemeteries. Many of us have old trees in our gardens, this doesn't mean they are woods.

taper Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The woods in COC are very beautiful. Would be

> terrible to see them destroyed.


Quite and the area in CNC on One Tree Hill. Regardless of the terminology and history they are beautiful natural wooded areas that have a high amenity for a large number in the community not to mention the wildlife.


Regarding the Muslim burials - it is my understanding that the burials in Nunhead are only suitable for burials for the Turkish community and not traditional Islamic burials. This was confirmed by the Imam of Peckham Mosque who also said that they generally use Kemnal Park.


Regarding the costs: the 5.1m will not be recouped. The sales of plots and interment fees only covers the revenue costs of the burial service and not even that. This is 5.1m that could be spent on other projects.


The terrible state and danger of area z has been exaggerated in my view with some minor landscaping and natural clay capping it could be got into a state where access was possible and at a fraction of the cost.

HopOne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not so. There are 2 cemeteries involved and there

> is some historic woodland on One Tree Hill that is

> under threat.


Is this the "virgin woodland"?

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd be interested to learn how old woodland has to

> be to be defined as historic. Here is a picture

> of One Tree Hill taken in 1905 - no woodland

> there.


I have a slightly earlier picture than the Nisbet. This shows One Tree Hill from Peckham Rye Common. I count three trees.


The Nisbet also has a map of the fields on our side of One Tree Hill.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HopOne Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Not so. There are 2 cemeteries involved and

> there

> > is some historic woodland on One Tree Hill that

> is

> > under threat.

>

> Is this the "virgin woodland"?


It is described thus in LBS conservation plan:


"a wooded area of virgin ground in the south west of Camberwell New near One Tree Hill"


http://www.southwark.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/11448/conservation_management_plan_for_camberwell_new_cemetery


It is actually next to One Tree Hill nature reserve. If the hill itself is called "One Tree Hill" then it is on the One Tree Hill.


Here is the area on google maps.




It is not ancient woodland but it has 20/30 year old native oaks. There are some very old oaks near by on the boundary with the allotments.

No I am saying the eastern slope of One Tree Hill in CNC is in fact on One Tree Hill not next to it.


I didn't write it but I suppose "virgin" because it has never been used for graves before and "woodland" because it is covered in trees.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...