Jump to content

Any electricians out there? Help needed


BikeChick

Recommended Posts

I have some builders in my home doing some renovation work (2 rooms being stripped back and re-fitted, one being a bathroom ? no extension or anything). As part of that work they have done some electrical work, which includes adding a couple of additional sockets, adding two spotlights in one room and replacing 4 spotlights with 2 wall lights, a pendant and a spotlight in the bathroom. The builder doing the work is not able to certify the electrics (i.e. he does electrical work but he is not a qualified electrician). They keep telling me it doesn't need to be certified as they have not added any circuits, they have run everything off the existing circuits as they didn't need to add anything. Is this correct?

Thank you so much to anyone who can advise....

work in the bathroom may need to be done by at least a Part P qualified electrician, it depends on what 'Zone' the work is in (ie how close to the bath or shower). Adding to circuits (as long as they are not in kitchens/bathrooms/outside) does not need the Part P qualification but personally I would be very dubious about any 'non qualified' electrician doing any work in my house. Builders who think the can do anything can be very dangerous - I learnt this the hard way years ago when a builder made some alterations to some gas pipes - they leaked and could have been deadly. If you employed them on the basis you thought they would be using electricians then I would insist they pay an electrician to test this
I agree with eastdulwichproperty and I always use my part p registered electrician for any work I do in clients houses especially bathrooms regardless if inknow im competant, there are many regulations that change often and only a registered electrician would keep up to date with this I think. A certificate of minor works is needed Im almost certain of this.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...