Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My litle one is 8 weeks now and I've found that he's a better sleeper on his tummy .. in fact if I put him down at 10pm/11pm he doesn't wake until about 7am the following morning .. this morning I actually woke him myself!

Am I a bad mother? hehe ;-)

A) sleeping on tummies is frowned apon

B) He's only just 8 weeks - surely he should be feeding through the night .. but instead I'm getting a full night sleep!

Do I continue putting him on his tummy and just count my blessings that he's a good night sleeper?

And ps, it works for me so maybe there are other mothers out there that may want to try their little ones on their tummies for a better sleep too!! A friend through NCT has also given up on her little one sleeping on her back as she doesn't settle so we're both finding this works for us.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/7595-sleeping-on-tummy-not-on-back/
Share on other sites

It is recognised that babies do often sleep better on their fronts (Which is why this was the recomended way of putting them to bed for years), but you should be aware that this is thought to be one of the contributing factors to why there is a lower risk of SIDs amongst babies put to sleep on their backs. The very fact that the baby sleeps more deeply on his/her front means they are less likely to wake if there is an irregularity in their breathing.


The 'back to sleep' campaign was one of the most successful public health initiatives ever to take place in the uk, and has shown similar beneficial results in the other countries that have adopted it. I'm not sure I'd take the risk for the sake of a few more hours uninterrupted sleep.


As for the feeding though, don't worry, as long as he's making up for it during the day and there are plenty of wet nappies, then he'll be doing fine.

I'm a doctor and not a parent, so possible viewed as the enemy round here, but I agree with Gubodge.


Sleeping young babies on their front is not so much "frowned upon" but known to be a risk factor for SIDS. Obviously, that doesn't mean that every baby sleeping on their front is at risk, or that every case of SIDS is in a baby who slept on their front, but it has been shown (along with having a smoker in the house) to one of the major risk factors.


Just to be clear, I'm not trying to be alarmist and I'm not criticising, judging or dictacting what anyone does with their own child. Everyone makes their own choices and every parent and every baby is different, but it's worth being informed of the risks. Have a look at the FSID website for more information.

no, thank you very much for your honest opinions! you hear so much going backward and forward .. but you've both put your argument very well .. much appreciated! its sad when your main support are parents, and mothers in particular, yet the views tend to be so different - as parents keep saying to me "how times have changed".

i will continue to try and settle him on his back - thanks again

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...