Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw him last year too, this is truely amazing. He stopped outside Summerfields bought a pukka pie and a copy of Non League Weekly then was off on his way back towards Forest Hill.


This was an unforgetable moment! I caught it with my I Phone.


http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Qu7o1nxZrkI/SoaF0ACpkNI/AAAAAAAABVM/CbZ2j5hE3Z4/s1600-h/photo-763972.jpg

a quick google yielded this pathetic comment:


Peter Theo is a former Millwall (unconfirmed) and Arsenal (unconfirmed) player who has become a property tycoon (unconfirmed). Peter Theo is also the footballer who's career ended prematurely due to a pie related knee injury, however, since then, he has gained respect from the footballing world for his wikipedia entry (marked for deletion due to minor fabrications of a football career).

Also no idea who he is, but I honestly can't imagine rushing for my i-phone to video anyone cycling and shopping in Somerfield on a Tuesday morning (and not just because i don't have an i-phone)


Anna_80, I'm happy for you and the joy this has clearly brought you, but I've just don't get it.

Is he like Luther Blisset* in Italy, an anarchist collective, we are legion for we are Luther Blisset (I kid you not I even have a historical novel written by him/them).


On the subject of pies, who was the ex professional with brief spell at Champion Hill who was a tad, errm, roly poly?


*except of course Luther Blisset was real, or at least that's what they want you to think!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Politician's moving from one party to another, especially when local is worth discussing. You have to wonder what they are driven by, and particularly in this instance, as their new party is moving in strange directions.
    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...