Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh I get it...BB is showing off that he and his wife can afford 4 children, and that he can stay at home....anyway it's her body that will suffer so you should give her the choice. Unless she's thinking about getting a proper job (and therefore takes a massive drop in salary). Depends on the size of your mortgage...

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 4 kids with only 100K household income? Might have

> to put the ski trips on hold (or at least

> downgrade to Italy).


ED with a household income of 100k....the holder of this parody account needs to fire their fact checker.

I am no parody. 100k is reasonable enough and we are comfortably off. She currently gives me ?1500 per month for shopping and all the kids stuff. She pays everything else. I actually used to work in the City on a good mint, but have given that up to be totally locally-based in ED, so I'm thinking of what I could do, though I've had a couple of ideas for a stall on NX Rd and also a shop on LL.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mmmm...you 'have' 3 kids and you think you can

> have a stall and shop......oh yes, clipipity clop



Well the stall would just be on Saturdays and Sundays until I've had time to open the shop. I think I would do school hours for the shop Tuesday to Friday and then a little bit longer on Saturdays. But thinking about that it has put me off the idea of having another sprog - so I'll just no to my wife if she mentions it again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The venn diagram of people who are personally really bothered by the noise from GALA and are also deeply concerned about the local bat population looks remarkably just like a circle.
    • Language is a fluid and evolving thing and as it changes the original meaning of words can alter to take on a new true meaning or meanings. Original meaning is not the same as true meaning. Take the word literal which is now used to mean the very opposite of how the word used to be used, irritating for some of us but demonstrates the English language is vibrant and alive and also very subjective. But I must go and make myself a cup of tea now or I will literally die of thirst 
    • With the right type of feeder arrangement the access by parakeets, squirrels and rats can be eliminated completely. Likewise, the spread of disease can be minimised. The best method is to hang individual feeders inside a wire  cage that has a 2"x2" mesh on all sides that is mounted above ground. Being above ground it stops slugs and rats getting in. And with mesh on the bottom,the risk of transmitting disease from any droppings is eliminated. Small birds feel safe from predators in three These cages are available online for about £33
    • It is worthwhile noting that the original technical meaning was 'a reduction of 10%', which does not, to my mind, chime at all with 'drastically reduce'. I know that's how it is, I think lazily, often used nowadays but it does allow 'decimate' to be used so loosely that it loses meaning. And it can be confusing to those who know it's original meaning. I think that the fact that decimate and devastate are close homonyms does not help things here. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...