Jump to content

Recommended Posts

He certainly appears to have tricked the volunteers into believing that they had actually predicted the winning numbers.


As for the performance on Wednesday, it might as well have been just a split-screen video effect - that being the cheapest and easiest option - since he revealed nothing about it. Very disappointing.

Very disappointing. Misdirection is one thing, but Derren Brown blatantly lied before and during this programme, the title of the programme was dishonest. Of course magicians lie all the time ("you had a completely free choice of card") but Brown's lying makes me uncomfortable, since he's encouraging a lot of susceptible people to believe in pseudo-psychological babble. Mind you, the HHT "trick" he did in the middle of the show is a neat bit of maths. It's a phenomenon known as Penney-Ante,and is genuine (albeit nothing to do with the people wearing red hats).

Complete nonsense. Very disappointing. His pseudo-psychological explanations are often semi-convincing, but this was just a crock of shite. The coin trick and story about the weight of the cow were irrelevant, and all the stuff about automatic writing and averaging the numbers was an insult.


I hope he redeems himself with the mass-hypnotism one he's trying next time.

its a shame cause he's really shot himself in the foot with this one.

His horse racing prog was Derren at his best where he fooled and then told the truth which just as entertaining as the fooling.

We all knew this one was a 'trick' and to spend a whole hour telling us otherwise was a waste of time.

He is a great live performer and a thoughtful intelligent guy who sometimes is a bit crap.

Will everyone shut the f@ck up, spoilt rotten we are these days.

When I was a kid, we had David 'Folds His Arms And Looks Like A Skull And Crossbones' Nixon for our magical entertainment.

The climax of most of his tricks was with the words "I think you'll find the card you picked was the nine of clubs"

Pleb on stage looks suitably amazed, plebs in audience batter their hands numb.

It was either that or The Black & White Minstrel Show, so I shouldn't complain really.

Still I like Dezza, and just by coincidence I picked up one of his books in an animal charity shop in Tooting yesterday.

The good thing is that the book is published by a specialist magic imprint and has the endorsement 'This is a book for the serious thinker who would normally disregard 99% of a magic-book's content'

The bad thing is that the charity shop wasn't named 'Paws For Thought'

Still, can't have everyting I suppose. Any way I'll give the book a bit of a once over this weekend and get back to you.

Probably as a sort of Swami or somesuch.

Any how I'd strongly advise never playing poker with me.

I've no idea of the rules and am completley sh!t at it.

This afternoon I met someone who had seen both shows. He had rejected the explanation based on averaging guesses as bullsh*t but thought that Brown?s ?admission? ? that the lotto?s normal balls had been surreptitiously swapped for heavier versions ? was the actual explanation!


I couldn't be bothered to argue with him. Brownie must be laughing all the way to the bank.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'd start with the wooden nickels and build.


Oh yes, the old wooden nickel trick, those were the days - before the grandiose delusions acquired resistance to the meds, alas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was a reactionary post and inappropriate when talking about a real case and a real person who was harmed.  London streets are generally pretty safe.  Sadly violent crime happens from time to time, as it always has.
    • Do tell, CPR Dave, what the spiteful jealous stuff is - I'm intrigued.  Agree - Burnham is a top class communicator (polar opposite of Starmer) he'd do a great job of uniting the party. I still think Wes Streeting has the edge, though I'm sure he has more enemies as well. 
    • This is a huge part of the problem.   Starmer is only interested in himself, not in what is best for our country.    There's a litany of stuff he's done for spiteful jealous personal reasons which has damaged the nation enormously. Burnham would be a much better leader than of the other dross left behind when Starmer goes. To inflict a worse leader (and PM) upon us for his own selfish reasons would add to the problems and be entirely in keeping with his woeful premiership so far.
    • I heard today there was a burglary in Lacon Road yesterday evening between 20.00 - 22.00,  apparently the owners were home at the time & thieves got away with electrical items along with the owners car!  Wtf!   Anyone heard anything else?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...