Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"BBW - I can assue you that I have never had any domestic staff."


You disappoint me Sean, you disappoint me deeply. I thought that as a moderator you'd be relying on the enforced services of an enslaved typist to convey your authoritarian addresses in your capacity as a helper elf to the administrator.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> BBW - I can assue you that I have never had any

> domestic staff, Any empathy with the Barnoness is

> entirely due to a distaste for mobs, coupled with

> a "sacking for everything" culture which seems to

> be afoot


Unless you happen to be a member of the RMT....running red lights, boozing on the job, opening doors on the wrong side of the train...no worries.

I have a professional job and must not bring myself or profession into disrepute. I do everything legit and if I am not sure I take professional advice to make sure I am doing things legally or erronthe side of caution.I do not have the resources of Lady Scotland but I do follow procedures. I think it stinks. What happened with David Blunkett and others that employed those they should not have?

If you're the minister for transport and you get caught for speeding, what should happen?


A. Fine / Ban (as appropriate) - like everyone else.

B. Sacked, stripped and publicly flogged on live television


The notion that someone should face and entirely different punishment - for a civil offence - other than that which the law requires, is complete nonsense.

I think Baroness Scotland should have resigned - if there was any possibility of her accidental employment of a Tongan housekeeper leading to someone dying and a criminal conviction.


Sadly, this is about accidentally employing a Tongan housekeeper without the right to work, not stacking-up on booze and wielding a potentially lethal weapon on a public highway.

The current fashion for demanding resignations over the most inconsequential of issues has led to a digging-in amongst politicians, civil servants and industry bigwigs, to the point that hardly anyone will go - ever - unless someone literally trusses them up and carries them out of the door.


It's part of the reason why when there is an actual scandal - like a real proper scandal (remember them?) - no-one goes.

I make you right on that one *Bob*.

And as for getting Joanna Whalley to star in a film on the matter, I should bleedin' cocoa.

And as for the Pet Shop Boys writing the theme song, you're havin' a Turkish, aincha?

And as for getting a singer of Dusty Springfield's calibre to perform said song, fackorfaahtoutofit.

It's a bit like the reverse of when someone, maybe your uncle, usually restricts himself to dry and pithy observations, to the extent that you almost think they don't have an opinion, and then *BAM* out of nowhere they start talking all serious-like about a subject. It makes you pay more attention....

Incidentally, Scotland is also being investigated for ?170,000 of expenses for which she might not have been entitled to.


But naturally the Tongan Housekeeper incident (from which she was set to profit ZILCH) is a tastier tabloid morsel.


And anyway.. expenses.. been there.. boo-ring, eh?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...