Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just got back and made a sandwich with a cup of tea and having a potter about on the forum and have just stunbled across StevetT's thread in the drawing room:


Should one child per famaily be made law?


"As we are an over populated country should we adopt the same ideas on population control as China, one family one child?"


I'm not about to go into the details and possible ulterior motives that have inspired this thread but I can't help salute SteveT's unaware sense of humour. That completely caught me off guard and cracked me up. You may well be attempting to generate discussion Steve but if that fails just rest assured that your efforts weren't lost.


That was genuinely funny and I thank you for it.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8175-thank-you-so-much-stevet/
Share on other sites

How would they manage it?


Forceable sterilisation after your first sprog or forced abortions?


I thought the birth rate was going down and we are going to be stuffed when it comes to people wiping our arses for us when we get old.


Have we suddenly been popping out sprogs like bacteria multiply or something cos it was only last year we had all of those scary headlines about an aging population.


Maybe we should just cull old twats instead, what do you reckon?


Lovely guy, that SteveT, wouldn't want to cull him obviously!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • 🤣 re your mystic powers! Didn't want to just put a 🤣 on your post in case people thought I was laughing because the cat had been found!
    • Hopefully, they won't wash the changing room mats poolside in future so the filters won't be overworked keeping the water clean!!!
    • I agree with your sentiment, however you are mistaken about the Dulwich Estate. Their sole purpose is to make as much money as possible to give to the schools they support, as well as the almshouses and other historical buildings. They do not care about social housing (except subsidised housing for teachers of the schools), refreshing the area, low-rent studios, charming but affordable pub, etc. While they are a charity, their purpose is very constrained/focused and whatever they do with this site, it has to make money for them. It's not that they're being nasty or stingy, it's just what their statutes tell them they have to do. Note that I am not defending them, but knowing the above helps understand why they do what they do, even if sometimes it seems to go against the wishes of the local community. They are not answerable to the local community, and their only oversight is the charity commission and the courts. And of course, like all bureaucracies (esp those with limited oversight), they look after themselves very well. 
    • Perhaps responses are made by DM?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...