Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


Just wondering if anyone has had experience in applying for a state school that is not the closest school to them? Due to a property falling through we may have to move closer to another school rather than our first choice. There is only 0.1 mile in it though and we would be 0.2 mile away from our first choice. Just don't want to risk losing our first choice by moving closer to another...


Many thanks, Becky

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/81826-help-school-catchment-question/
Share on other sites

Lots of people put their first preference down as a school that's not closest to them. If you miss out, it will simply be because you are outside of the catchment area, not because you live closer to another school.


If you have your heart set on a particular school you will need to research carefully to find out the catchment area, which is a bit of an inexact science, especially if you're right on the border of their reach.


Good luck.

  • 2 weeks later...

Straight line distance for community schools. Have you checked the brochure which gives the furthest distance for the previous year (not a guarantee, but an indication) ? There are a variety of catchment mapping tools as well. The GLA does one, there's also findaschool.


http://www.findaschool.info/


I must stress again, these are both approximate indications and NOT the basis for admissions or an appeal. They will basically let you know if you are within a ghost of a chance.

  • 2 weeks later...

Southwark uses straight line distance, after siblings and look after children for its community schools, as do most academies and free schools. The community school distances vary from year to year and are in the primary admissions brochure. Academies can do what they like (and they do) and (some) will fiddle the admissions so they don't have to take difficult children. Church/Voluntary aided schools will require you in the main to attend church or be a practising Christian of a certain faith to attend them.


There is no single tool that will tell you for sure if you will get into a particular school.

Criteria differ for each school.

Some based on proximity are measured by straight line while others are measured by 'safe walking route'. Others are based on ability and non-verbal testing will determine which band (ie score percentage) your child fits in - with selection from each band.

All have priority for siblings and social needs, or religious background (ie proximity/ banding criteria become secondary).

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Criteria differ for each school.

> Some based on proximity are measured by straight

> line while others are measured by 'safe walking

> route'. Others are based on ability and non-verbal

> testing will determine which band (ie score

> percentage) your child fits in - with selection

> from each band.

> All have priority for siblings and social needs,

> or religious background (ie proximity/ banding

> criteria become secondary).


Most schools at primary level don't test (thankfully). Secondary, it's a bit of a mixed bag. AFAIK, all schools in Southwark use "as the crow flies". the problem with safe walking distance is that their are a number of definitions, and some parents will tell you crossing a dual carriageway at street level is safe, if they can get their DD or DS into a "good school"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
    • Hi Trinidad. Have just messaged you about a facebook post...
    • I don't know if he does newborns but I highly reccomend Will Westwood at Goose Green Clinic I've tried many Osteopaths locally and in Central London over the years and he Is now my 1st choice.... Highly qualified, and very gentle with good advice and aftercare.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...