Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I know there has been a post on this recently with a helpful link to Southwark website but I am still confused.


My daughter is (2 years 2 months) is at a childminders 5 days a week and that?s the plan until she is 3ish. I understand that children are expected to go ?somewhere else? before starting school at 4 (is it 4 or 4.5 ?) My confusion lies in where this somewhere else should be ?


I understand that some of the schools in the area have nursery /preschool classes but my closest school (St Johns) does not. Do most children go to one of the nursery schools attached to these schools or the school that they would like their children to go to and if so should I have registered ages ago ? (or are there such limited places that it?s out of the question anyway ?)


I have my daughter?s name down at Gumboots Nursery for when she is three but now I am wondering if that?s the wrong kind of Nursery as it?s a day nursery instead of state run nursery school which I now realise is quite different.. Or is it common to go from a day nursery straight to school ?


The likes of Herne Hill, Montessori etc are problematic as I think they are mainly just very short sessions and both my Husband and I work all day which is why the 8-6 works brilliantly with the childminder we have now. Or do most working parents go with the short sessions then pay for a childminder to look after their child for the rest of the day ?


Also I understand that the 3 sessions or 12 hours a week are paid for once the child turns 3. Can these be used for any sort of childcare ?


So many questions ?! If anyone can shed any light I would really appreciate it. I am now concerned that I should have done something ages ago but still not quite sure as to what that something is ?!


I am sure my situation must be quite common so any advice , recommendations or solutions that have worked for people would be really useful thanks

Some schools have pre-schools attached and take children from 3 years old (Southwark has a list of all primaries with nursery/pre schools attached) My little girl started at St Anthony's pre school two weeks ago - I only put her name down January I think last year (so you aren't too late!) but yes, most pre-school sessions are 2.5 hours to 3 hours so very difficult regarding childcare. I have now got a nanny (or you can get a childminder) who has her from 8, takes her to and picks her up from pre-school then looks after her until I get home. It's not an essential thing to do, I just thought that my daughter would benefit, but there's some excellent day nurseries (i.e. not pre-schools) like Gumboots that would prob give them the same experiences (think they all follow an early years foundation thing?) I just wanted her to do a bit of formal school type thing to get her used to it and she does love it but has been a nightmare sorting childcare.

If you're applying to St Johns, then there is not much point trying to get into a nursery at another school, so contact nurseries to put her name down for her 15h at all nurseries your minder could take her to for half day sessions, for you?


Do you use vouchers, for your minder, btw? can save ?100 pcm using those.

Nurseries attached to schools cannot usually cater for the numbers who will start reception and many of the children at the nursery will go onto different schools, so there are always be plenty of children starting in reception who have come from private nurseries/child minders/home. But I'm all for pre-school nursery if you can get a place, it's a nice gentle way of getting them used to the school environment that otherwise can come as a bit of a shock come reception.


My eldest went to Goodrich Nursery in the morning and was then picked up by her private nursery to spend the rest of the day there. Many others spend the rest of the day with childminders, so it would be worthwhile checking if your childminder would be prepared to do nursery pick-up/drop-offs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...