Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably survivors from the times when M&S sold only clothes and were not seen as particularly middle class. It was only when they introduced their food range in the early 1980s that they began to appeal more to the middle classes. Their food was comparatively speaking very very expensive and gradually their marketing was pitched towards the middle classes and the aspirational, for their food products at least.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably

> survivors from the times when M&S sold only

> clothes and were not seen as particularly middle

> class.


Yep. Although these days Brixton is full of affluent professionals, and a house on a nice road is probably more expensive than ED. It's moved with the times.

I was in the M&S in Charlton on Saturday. It opened this year and was very busy. My brother in law lives in Charlton and while its not a bad area its not really upmarket either. M&S are everywhere. It doesn't mark East Dulwich out as especially rich to have one.


I think there haven't been many in this part of SE London because our highstreet units are too small. Now that M&S and Waitrose are both rolling out smaller store formats, they'll become much more ubiquitous. To date, they have been opened in large retail units available in places like Brixton or in new retail parks like the one in Charlton where they could operate at scale.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably

> survivors from the times when M&S sold only

> clothes and were not seen as particularly middle

> class.



The Brixton store was definitely there in the sixties, and possibly the fifties as well.


My (rather snobby) grandmother viewed M&S as very downmarket, even though some of the royal family were reputed to buy their underwear there (not from the Brixton branch, I presume :)) )

Not sure-- what I've read about it before was that it was developed operationally for market penetration.



In this article, Waitrose said it was part of their strategy to double the size of their business in 10 years. Almost all of the new M&S stores are in the Simply Food format.


There was some discussion on the other thread if the one on LL would be simply food or a Food Hall (slightly different offering). However M&S have publicly stated they won't open anymore stores retailing clothing because of online sales.

"Now that M&S and Waitrose are both rolling out smaller store formats, they'll become much more ubiquitous. To date, they have been opened in large retail units available in places like Brixton or in new retail parks like the one in Charlton where they could operate at scale."


The Brixton M&S store predates any roll out of smaller store formats, it is a remnant of the old style M&S before the introduction of their food range. I can remember it definitely from the 80s, Sue can remember it from at least the 60s, and I suspect it originally opened some time in the 30s.

I agree with that 100%.


My point was that before the small store format which started in 2001, M&S could only open in large retail units on historical high streets such as the large store in Brixton or in new large retail parks like in Charlton. SE London (with numerous exceptions, including Rye Lane) primarily has high streets with small retailing units that prevent chains that need to operate at a certain scale from opening. To better penetrate these suburban markets (not just here but across the country) retailers are developing retailing strategies for smaller format stores (the pricing and logistics are very different).

The larger stores especially those outside urban areas are suffering reduced sales due to a gradual change in shopping habits. Twenty years ago most people would do a massive shop once per week at the superstore. Today more people eat out, and more people shop two or three times per week buying locally and cooking more fresh food. In a way it goes back to how things probably before the superstores. The big supermarkets are now selling off the larger plots in their land banks and backing out of building large stores.

When I was working I would do a weekly shop at the week end..


Being retired I tend to be out most days shopping locally on foot although I take the car when I need

heavy / bulky stuff like Bleach / paper towels / washing powder and tinned produce.. bottled Beer.. Wine.


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...