Jump to content

IceLand


cb10

Recommended Posts

The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably survivors from the times when M&S sold only clothes and were not seen as particularly middle class. It was only when they introduced their food range in the early 1980s that they began to appeal more to the middle classes. Their food was comparatively speaking very very expensive and gradually their marketing was pitched towards the middle classes and the aspirational, for their food products at least.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably

> survivors from the times when M&S sold only

> clothes and were not seen as particularly middle

> class.


Yep. Although these days Brixton is full of affluent professionals, and a house on a nice road is probably more expensive than ED. It's moved with the times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was in the M&S in Charlton on Saturday. It opened this year and was very busy. My brother in law lives in Charlton and while its not a bad area its not really upmarket either. M&S are everywhere. It doesn't mark East Dulwich out as especially rich to have one.


I think there haven't been many in this part of SE London because our highstreet units are too small. Now that M&S and Waitrose are both rolling out smaller store formats, they'll become much more ubiquitous. To date, they have been opened in large retail units available in places like Brixton or in new retail parks like the one in Charlton where they could operate at scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably

> survivors from the times when M&S sold only

> clothes and were not seen as particularly middle

> class.



The Brixton store was definitely there in the sixties, and possibly the fifties as well.


My (rather snobby) grandmother viewed M&S as very downmarket, even though some of the royal family were reputed to buy their underwear there (not from the Brixton branch, I presume :)) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure-- what I've read about it before was that it was developed operationally for market penetration.



In this article, Waitrose said it was part of their strategy to double the size of their business in 10 years. Almost all of the new M&S stores are in the Simply Food format.


There was some discussion on the other thread if the one on LL would be simply food or a Food Hall (slightly different offering). However M&S have publicly stated they won't open anymore stores retailing clothing because of online sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Now that M&S and Waitrose are both rolling out smaller store formats, they'll become much more ubiquitous. To date, they have been opened in large retail units available in places like Brixton or in new retail parks like the one in Charlton where they could operate at scale."


The Brixton M&S store predates any roll out of smaller store formats, it is a remnant of the old style M&S before the introduction of their food range. I can remember it definitely from the 80s, Sue can remember it from at least the 60s, and I suspect it originally opened some time in the 30s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that 100%.


My point was that before the small store format which started in 2001, M&S could only open in large retail units on historical high streets such as the large store in Brixton or in new large retail parks like in Charlton. SE London (with numerous exceptions, including Rye Lane) primarily has high streets with small retailing units that prevent chains that need to operate at a certain scale from opening. To better penetrate these suburban markets (not just here but across the country) retailers are developing retailing strategies for smaller format stores (the pricing and logistics are very different).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The larger stores especially those outside urban areas are suffering reduced sales due to a gradual change in shopping habits. Twenty years ago most people would do a massive shop once per week at the superstore. Today more people eat out, and more people shop two or three times per week buying locally and cooking more fresh food. In a way it goes back to how things probably before the superstores. The big supermarkets are now selling off the larger plots in their land banks and backing out of building large stores.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was working I would do a weekly shop at the week end..


Being retired I tend to be out most days shopping locally on foot although I take the car when I need

heavy / bulky stuff like Bleach / paper towels / washing powder and tinned produce.. bottled Beer.. Wine.


DulwichFox

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi Everyone … I've been a cleaner for 17 years, I work punctually and responsibly, leaving  your home is clean and organized. The experience includes: *Private Houses *High cleaning standards. *Ironing  *Deep Cleaner  *5 star Airbnb    Send me a message and booking a  trial. And get a DISCOUNT 😀 📲07889693871 (WhatsApp Just)   Thanks  Gra
    • Ok here goes.....   Since day 1 of the LTNs the emergency services have been very clear - blocked roads increase response times. Southwark councillors were more than aware of this from the beginning of the LTN debacle during Covid because, when the council were going LTN mad and were trying to carpet bomb them everywhere they had suggested one for Peckham Rye and had initiated a consultation. As usual they took glowing endorsements of their proposal to close parts of Peckham Rye from the cycle lobby but got negative feedback from TFL and the emergency services due to the disruption their physical closure barriers were going to have - the emergency services made their preference clear that they do not like physical barriers. Needless to say Southwark ignored that emergency service input and pushed ahead with their plans only to cancel them when the realised LTNs were turning residents against them.   Now the video below (from March 2021) is interesting from a couple of perspectives: 1) Clearly LAS were making their feelings on permanent closures very clear to Southwark - please scroll to 1 hour 4 minutes to hear from them - 51 of the 170 delays caused by LTNs in London were in Southwark - yet it took over a year for emergency vehicles to be given access and, if I remember correctly FOIs showed that LAS had been writing to Dale Foden and the council alerting them to the delays. So why the delay and why is there a constant narrative from local lobby groups that the junction has to be closed to ALL traffic (including emergency vehicles) and why the new designs return to a partial full closure of the junction - most rational and pragmatic people can surely see that the compromise installed in 2022 to allow emergency vehicle access was the most sensible approach.   The council put the desires of local lobby groups ahead of the emergency services...which is madness...and then that leads us to point 2)....   2) Notice the presence of Jeremy Leach on the call - not a councillor but the Co-Optee of the council's environmental scrutiny committee and he is constantly pushing the councillors to do more to deal with traffic issues and reduce traffic. I suspect he is deemed one of the "expert" voices the council was turning to for guidance at this period. But, much like the activist researchers the council turned to Jeremy is very much an "activist expert" and was chair of the London Living Streets, co-founder of Action Vision Zero and part of Southwark Cyclists - so you can see why if the council was taking guidance and direction from him how they may have not been making decisions in the public interest. Clearly someone has convinced the council that the junction needs to be closed to all vehicles as there cannot be any other explanation for why they held out for so long (that created increased response times) - remember they are wasting another £1.5m to close one arm of the roads permanently again - honestly if someone wants to enlighten me to a part of this story I am missing then feel free but to me it looks like something very odd has been going on at the DV junction and the council is ignoring the majority and listening to the few...   https://lrscconference.org.uk/index.php/agenda-speakers/jeremy-leach-co-founder-action-vision-zero/     No it was 64% of the total who lived in the consultation area - 57% when the council looked at all the respondents to the consultation.   3,162 (64%) wanted it returned to its original state 823 (17%) wanted it retained as was 422 (8%) wanted a different measure installed 564 (11%) wanted the measure, but modify/ enhance it with other features   So back then the 11% got their wish!   In every consultation in relation to the DV junction there has been overwhelming rejection of the council's plans by local residents - yet they carry-on wasting our money on it regardless - just who are they trying to placate?
    • Calton was particularly hideous. An ambulance wouldn’t have got anywhere fast.   
    • Not clear what point you are trying to make here Earl? A majority of those consulted wanted measures returned to their original state. Majority is the salient point. Again, if consultations are pretty irrelevent, as you seem to suggest, then why do oragnisations like Southwark Cyclists repeatedly prompt their members, whether local to the consultation area or not, to respond to consultations on CPZ or LTNs. What a waste of everyone's time if of no import in terms of local policy-making.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...