Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably survivors from the times when M&S sold only clothes and were not seen as particularly middle class. It was only when they introduced their food range in the early 1980s that they began to appeal more to the middle classes. Their food was comparatively speaking very very expensive and gradually their marketing was pitched towards the middle classes and the aspirational, for their food products at least.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably

> survivors from the times when M&S sold only

> clothes and were not seen as particularly middle

> class.


Yep. Although these days Brixton is full of affluent professionals, and a house on a nice road is probably more expensive than ED. It's moved with the times.

I was in the M&S in Charlton on Saturday. It opened this year and was very busy. My brother in law lives in Charlton and while its not a bad area its not really upmarket either. M&S are everywhere. It doesn't mark East Dulwich out as especially rich to have one.


I think there haven't been many in this part of SE London because our highstreet units are too small. Now that M&S and Waitrose are both rolling out smaller store formats, they'll become much more ubiquitous. To date, they have been opened in large retail units available in places like Brixton or in new retail parks like the one in Charlton where they could operate at scale.

nxjen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The Brixton and Eltham M&S stores are probably

> survivors from the times when M&S sold only

> clothes and were not seen as particularly middle

> class.



The Brixton store was definitely there in the sixties, and possibly the fifties as well.


My (rather snobby) grandmother viewed M&S as very downmarket, even though some of the royal family were reputed to buy their underwear there (not from the Brixton branch, I presume :)) )

Not sure-- what I've read about it before was that it was developed operationally for market penetration.



In this article, Waitrose said it was part of their strategy to double the size of their business in 10 years. Almost all of the new M&S stores are in the Simply Food format.


There was some discussion on the other thread if the one on LL would be simply food or a Food Hall (slightly different offering). However M&S have publicly stated they won't open anymore stores retailing clothing because of online sales.

"Now that M&S and Waitrose are both rolling out smaller store formats, they'll become much more ubiquitous. To date, they have been opened in large retail units available in places like Brixton or in new retail parks like the one in Charlton where they could operate at scale."


The Brixton M&S store predates any roll out of smaller store formats, it is a remnant of the old style M&S before the introduction of their food range. I can remember it definitely from the 80s, Sue can remember it from at least the 60s, and I suspect it originally opened some time in the 30s.

I agree with that 100%.


My point was that before the small store format which started in 2001, M&S could only open in large retail units on historical high streets such as the large store in Brixton or in new large retail parks like in Charlton. SE London (with numerous exceptions, including Rye Lane) primarily has high streets with small retailing units that prevent chains that need to operate at a certain scale from opening. To better penetrate these suburban markets (not just here but across the country) retailers are developing retailing strategies for smaller format stores (the pricing and logistics are very different).

The larger stores especially those outside urban areas are suffering reduced sales due to a gradual change in shopping habits. Twenty years ago most people would do a massive shop once per week at the superstore. Today more people eat out, and more people shop two or three times per week buying locally and cooking more fresh food. In a way it goes back to how things probably before the superstores. The big supermarkets are now selling off the larger plots in their land banks and backing out of building large stores.

When I was working I would do a weekly shop at the week end..


Being retired I tend to be out most days shopping locally on foot although I take the car when I need

heavy / bulky stuff like Bleach / paper towels / washing powder and tinned produce.. bottled Beer.. Wine.


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...