Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The postie turkeys just voted for Christmas. Lots of companies are now switching away from the royal mail, understandably so - the unions don't want modernisation so they have opted for extinction. The strike was over ages ago yet the parcels are not arriving - they are now on a go slow but let's be honest the East Dulwich sorting offices were awful before the strike and are now absymal.
got one today that was posted sept 5th, still have five letters i know have been posted in last 3 weeks that remain undelivered (including passport i need in 2 weeks time) - only hoping backlog gets worked through rather than destroyed as some suggest

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Better to fix the Royal Mail I would say - the

> workers attitudes might be out of date but the

> service itself has been deliberately run down


Why? Letters and post-boxes will be a thing of the past eventually, anyway. As for parcel delivery... how will a huge, broken ex government department serve us better than smaller, competing companies? I don't want to sound to much like Marmora Man, but... there are times when competition is a good thing.

true but we aren't there yet are we?


And why is the RM "broken"? Even in the US the Mail service is treated with more respect than successive governments here


Go back a couple of years, before competition - were we complaining about the lack of alternatives, the twice-daily post, the massive surcharges? I think we were pretty reasonably happy - I don't see what competition has brought to this table


If you introduce competition and then, deliberately, make the homegrown alternative look shabby, then of course people are going to compare the two (and possibly blame the workers in to the bargain)

The irony is that even if the strikes are successful in forcing RM to back down and "saving" jobs, the loss of confidence in RM means that this time next year they will probably have to make more workers redundant than would have lost their jobs if they'd gone along with the current plans. They seem to be stuck in the early 80's. Fundamentally, strikes only work if the people on strike are actually missed - like the miners' strikes when the country had to go to a 4 day week, or essential workers like firemen, tube drivers, even bin men. Sadly for them the RM is no longer as essential as it used to be - it's a bit like Starbucks workers going on strike. It might hurt the company they work for (and Dulwich Mum) but most of the country will just go to Caffe Nero or Pret instead and some of them won't come back when they realise the product is better.

peckhamboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The irony is that even if the strikes are

> successful in forcing RM to back down and "saving"

> jobs, the loss of confidence in RM means that this

> time next year they will probably have to make

> more workers redundant than would have lost their

> jobs if they'd gone along with the current plans.


I was thinking along the same lines!

Sean - it seems strange to cite the US, where private delivery firms are more commonplace, and more accessible to the general public than they are here. Hopefully the competition in the UK will become more established, and the public can vote with their feet.

I used it only because it remains government owned - whereas our govt seems to want shot of it


As I say, I agree that the need for such a service is diminishing rapidly, and I also agree that the union tactics are self-defeating


But the whole thing could be managed more honestly and efficiently. Tell people, we ARE going to run this thing down, you won't get the same postal service you had, other firms will be available, you'll be (mostly) ok. But it'll cost (you) more, Until then we will employ people who know all of the above and won't complain about it, we;ll cross-train as many existing employees as possible but things move on


Then stand on that ticket

As a loyal customer of Amazon for many years I have now had to inform them that I will no longer buy from them whilst they continue to use Royal Mail to deliver their parcels. Parcels are simply not getting to me, I have been waiting for one for about five weeks now. Amazon have kindly refunded me for the last two parcels but I feel it is unfair to continue to order from them and expect them to do this when Royal Mail are effectively 'stealing' the goods.
Some of my friends went to Fiji for a couple of weeks. Their postcard would have been sent no more than 11 days ago and it arrived yesterday. The cheque that was posted to me from Acton over a month ago still hasn't arrived..............

I was waiting for two parcels via Royal Mail. One posted 2 weeks ago, one 1 week ago. The one posted 1 week ago arrived this morning - placed behind our bin in full view of the street. We were home at the time but may not have heard a knock - if there was one. My assumption is that they are trying so hard to get rid of the backlog that they are not being as careful as usual (this item should have gone back to the sorting office for me to pick up). The item posted 2 weeks ago has still not arrived so my assumption is that this was also left outside the door but at a time when I was not in and could not bring it in - somebody knicked it!


Company is going to re-send 1st item by courier now. Saying that, couriers are just as bad at leaving things on the doorstep!

had a parcel (and note through my door to collect at Silvester Rd sorting office) on 02 Oct.

Went on Saturday 10 Oct to collect as was awa previous weekend and work in during week.

Got to sorting office at 0855 ( I know they open at 0800 on Saturdays).

Sign on door said they were open that day only 0800- 0900, I was lucky.

Gave man collection card.

He vanished for 5-6 mins. Queue built up.

Man comes back. No trace of parcel.

"Do you know what the parcel is" ?

'You tell me mate it's on your shelf isn't it ?'

"Come back next week we may find it then"

'What will change between now and next week ?'

"Dunno, just might have more luck next weekend"

'Oh right, fair point mate.....'


COULD YOU REALLY INVENT STUFF LIKE THIS ???? SOMEONE SENDS YOU A PARCEL AND YOU GET IT IF YOU'RE LUCKY !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The coop of Forest Hill Road is very different- cheerful and helpful staff 
    • Would you expose your young people to 'that man'? That is apparently a real question. 'That man' is in fact a retired Oxford Professor of Moral & Pastoral Theology who wrote a book setting out to provide a moral reckoning on the vexed subject of Britain's Empire and its history. What might formerly have been a purely academic matter has become highly contentious, and according to one Cambridge academic "serious shit" that needed to be CLOSED DOWN. It's all rather amazing, the stuff of satire or nightmare but not of the real world. Anyway, Lord Biggar accepted an invitation to visit Peckham and speak to and with a small audience that was due to include young Black students ... who in the end didn't come on the day! Having set the whole thing up to facilitate this encounter for them, the outcome was a disappointment. The conversation with Lord Biggar and audience was not:   
    • Entertaining a visitor from Philippines, she's been here before but I've promised lunch.  Somewhere a little different maybe, quirky?
    • Surely a very simple: "how much does the council receive from the organisers of the Gala festival for payment for use of Peckham Rye" would smoke out a response. The "commercial sensitivity" could be because the council are giving it away or it could be because Gala don't want others to know how much they are paying - it is really tough to make money from any type of festival these days and Wide Awake in Brockwell, for example, sent out a plea for people to buy tickets via a reduced price "Tell a Friend" special offer because (they said much of it linked to the problems Lambeth were having with the High Court) things were entering "squeaky bum time"  and they were struggling to hit their break-even point. It does make me wonder whether expansion is baked-in to the agreements the council has with the organisers for events like Gala as the organisers have to be able to scale the size of the event each year to try to make money. I do also how much of the "revenue" from these events might be swallowed up by the provision of the "free community" event element of them. The comment piece in the Guardian sums it up quite nicely: The heart of this issue seems to be how cash-strapped councils are becoming increasingly beholden to commercial interests to the detriment of the public. A weekend festival that welcomes 50,000 people can expect to raise about £500,000 for local authorities. Councils argue that this money goes back in the public purse, allowing them to continue funding free community events such as Lambeth’s beloved Country Show, though there doesn’t seem to be much transparency over exactly how much cash is raised or where it is allocated.   The issue for councils may well be that if people found out how much was actually being raised by these events that the community would say the disruption is not worth it and I do wonder how much of the revenue is being swallowed up by the provision of the "free event" using the same infrastructure. Any time a council doesn't want to share something openly very much suggests that it is because they think constituents won't like the answer.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...