Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Growing up near the coast in South Wales in the 60's I remember seeing Concord on some of its early test flights over the Bristol Channel once or twice. An awe inspiring sight, especially for a young lad back then. It was like a glimpse of the future.

Then a few years back, working in offices overlooking the Thames, I saw the dismantled Concord being floated down the river on barges (I think to be put on display in a museum somewhere?)


God, it made me feel old!

Muley Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Growing up near the coast in South Wales in the

> 60's I remember seeing Concord on some of its

> early test flights over the Bristol Channel once

> or twice. An awe inspiring sight, especially for a

> young lad back then. It was like a glimpse of the

> future.

> Then a few years back, working in offices

> overlooking the Thames, I saw the dismantled

> Concord being floated down the river on barges (I

> think to be put on display in a museum

> somewhere?)

>

> God, it made me feel old!


Yep..


On 9 April 1969, Brian Trubshaw made his first flight in the British-built prototype. The 22 minute flight left from a test runway at Filton near Bristol and landed at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/2/newsid_2514000/2514535.stm


DulwichFox

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...