Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yep, weirdly the prices of houses are dropping because the cost of houses is rising, put very simply.


Generally prices rises have been fuelled by among other things demand outstripping supply.

This is much more down to societal change (people staying single much longer and able to afford to buy on their own thanks to cheap credit) than anything to do with immigration which I inferred from your second point, but perhaps you were referring exactly to my point above.


The only way to relive that pressure is to build more houses. We have plenty of space to do this, it's just nobody wants anew town on their doorstep, which having grown up by Stevenage I can't say as I blame them.


The Lee valley is often molted which is a great plan for billions of pounds worth of flood damage, but hey.

Even if we are running out of space, there are other factors at work here other than supply-and-demand... e.g. availability of mortgages, "liquidity" and confidence in the housing market, employment, and the state of the economy in general.

Mockney Piers wrote:-

Yep, weirdly the prices of houses are dropping because the cost of houses is rising, put very simply.



Which makes no logical sense.



The cost of houses is directly related to how much anyone is willing to pay for them, put very accurately.

You would think so woldn't you but its not really what has just happened in the recent past. What?s happened is that prices have been directly related to how much banks are willing to lend people to buy them, which in turn leads to banks owning more dept and therefore thinking themselves richer for it and by making more and more money available unnaturally inflating the price of houses until it all predictably went bang.


And that was one of the main reasons for Le Credit Crunch, put very simply.

Brendan wrote:-

prices have been directly related to how much banks are willing to lend people to buy them.



Which have only been taken up by people who can afford to repay the loan, and those who failed became bankruptcy statistics, or sub-prime mortgages.

The price of a house isn't necessarily the main factor in the cost, because very very few people are cash buyers.


Most of us obviously have to get the bank to buy it in a hire purchase type arrangement.


The cost then becomes a reflection on how much you have to stump up initially, fees and of course interest rates. At the moment despite rock bottom BoE rates the cost is relatively high compared to the mortgage bonanza of recent times if you're looking to buy or remortgage.

In fact I think banks are currently taking the largest margins on mortgage lending in modern history.


So you might be willing to pay ?1000 a month, but not willing to pay ?50k deposit.


Hence the cost is too high, demand drops and prices go down. At this point it's much less relevant whether someone is willing to pay ?350k or ?400k face value. Put very very simply of course, as Jeremy said there are a larger number of factors, of which confidence is also a very very key one.

Yeah but that?s just my point Steve, in order to make sure the amount of money owed to them each year was growing exponential the banks, specifically in Britain and America, were not properly calculating how much would be an affordable amount to lend to people. This created the bubble.


In many country where the banks are more closely regulated (hellfire and communism I know) there are very strict rules on how much you can lend and the interest you can charge. This controls the property market and doesn?t let prices go skyrocketing and then crash.

Arrrr indeed 'in it together' Maurice, the wise words of David Cameron......although, of course, it is a bit easier to be in 'it together' with the odd ?1million plus fortune to hand - the shadow cabinet are certainly as a rule in 'that' together.

There?s a difference between ?responsibility? when you?re looking at getting a great big wodge of wonga from a deal and ?responsibility? when what you?re trying to do is put a roof over your family?s head.


But then again that may require a smidgen of empathy which as I?ve noted, from my not uneducated observation of the British political landscape, is a trait not attainable by the type of person who generally gives active support to the conservative party.


Christ I?m being some sort of irrational tory hating freak at the moment. I realise this, but unfortunately I?m having to deal, on a daily basis, with a bunch of highly unscrupulous individuals wnking over the conference in Manchester and its outcomes like a bunch of spoilt schoolboys who just found their first porno.


It?s nauseating.


Support for the labour party is delusional and stupid but support for the conservatives seems more and more to me like a financially sanctioned form of antisocial behaviour.

I suppose what im thinking is that as demand exceeds supply (not just at the mo but for the last few years). Wont the goal posts just shift and lower income groups will just be excluded form the mortgage market, as higher earners become the first time buyers shifting up the 'long term average'.

Obviously this will cause massive social problems, but i am really interested as unfortunately i want a bentley, a small one, possibly with a garden.

I can't remember the actual figure, but I think the total number of 'domiciles' in the UK is around 25m, with a population of over 60m.


Hence in that sense demand is already outstripping supply - the issue is the density of residents per domicile, the size, the quality and the location.


These attractiveness of these various attributes are defined culturally rather than economically, ensuring that supply and demand has far lower influence on price than the amount people are willing to sacrifice to gain social status.

mockney piers wrote:-

The price of a house isn't necessarily the main factor in the cost...........




The costs of repayment are what determines the take up on purchases of houses, whether it be a cash buyer a mortgage or bank loan.


It is directly related to what somone is willing to pay for it.

CT Wac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wont the goal posts just shift

> and lower income groups will just be excluded form

> the mortgage market


But this has already happened, hasn't it? Even to buy a modest one bed flat in Peckham, you're talking about something like 200k, so you'd need to be on a pretty reasonable salary.


> Obviously this will cause massive social problems,

> but i am really interested as unfortunately i want

> a bentley, a small one, possibly with a garden.


I'm not convinced it will cause massive social problems... or indeed any social problems. Owning a property isn't an essential requirement for a decent standard of living.

  • 1 month later...
There seems to be this myth constantly spouted that there is a lack of housing in the UK, there's not, at all. What there is a serious lack of is AFFORDABLE housing...when prices get too high (which they very much still are) it blocks off first-time buyers, therefore denying the market of that capital injection it is used to. Prices need to come down to oil the wheels of the very rusty housing market.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • My understanding is the "free event" is 100% Gala, nothing to do with the council. Obviously Gala will still make money from the food & drink that they are trying to coerce punters into buying on their social media posts. Their costs will be negligible due to already having the infrastructure in place for Gala. So Gala are trying to appear community minded by providing this "free event", but the real goal is to set a precedent for a fourth day's festival - which surely no one could possibly object to?!? - in preparation for applying (again) for two three-day festivals spread over two weekends. It's only another two days, right, and the site & equipment is already there, so why would anyone object?!? More money for the council, much more money for Gala, win-win right? But yet another week of our park taken away from us, too, and another 18,000 people trampling & littering the park, and another week of disturbance for the native birds & wildlife...
    • Meson Don Felipe on The Cut was my go to place for many years. Though it's now many years since I was there. 10-15 minute walk from the Tate. If you go can you tell me what it's like nowadays?
    • Doubt you would have got much change out of £150.00 for battery and certainly having forked out for it, best to use your car. I recently sold  my car via webuyanycar.com - very pleasant experience & was roughly what I was expecting. Pop your bangers reg jnto their website to get an idea of price - they do send e mails once a fortnight/month just as an aid for you. Easy enough to delete - don’t even have to read valuation. They literally buy any car - if you can’t get it to them, they will charge you to get it there or recommend a co that will do it for you. Must say, mine was a 2014 reg and whilst a bit suspicious, paid extra to get money into my account as needed it for next car but was assured funds had I not gone down route I took would be in my account within 5 days. I now live in the country - every time I have been back to Dulwich and surrounding area, normally get a fine for driving at wrong time or parking at  wrong time so if I drive now, park in West or East Dulwich and do everything else by public transport and walking.  Were I still to be living in ED then before I left was pondering this very issue but since I have been back regularly for health reason I no longer drive but take the train and then buses, walk or Uber. Much cheaper than running a car and had I stayed, that would have been the course I would have taken. I don’t go out everyday, have an allotment or job to go to or family so in my case, would be cheaper not to have a car.  Was truely shocked   at the cost of second hand cars…..but where I now live only has a smattering of buses so no choice but to have wheels to get from A to B etc.          
    • If you don't use the car often then suggest disconnect the battery between use by undoing the earth (negative / minus sign) cable from the battery and the battery will then last longer between use. Remember, central locking, alarm, clock, etc won't work with battery disconnected and wit ours I have to lock the doors with central locking before disconnecting battery as only have key on one door (leave bonnet open before locking doors). Hope this helps  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...